Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



Krankenstyle posted:

probably the smarter play tbh

100% the smarter move because they realized self driving cars are decades off let uber continue to burn money instead.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



Sagebrush posted:

my hot take: they mutually decided to settle upon the realization that digging through the details of the tech in court would demonstrate that both companies are nowhere near capable of doing what they claim, and that self-driving cars are still decades out

:lol: simulposting

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



my first va doctor used dragon natural speaking because he was a slow typer and it was faster. he's now the director of medicine at a small alabama med school.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford




i know racoon natural speed king, but it still worked pretty well for him.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



graph posted:

thank you :)

:grovertoot:

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



flakeloaf posted:

:aaa:

do you have insulated stairs in your house

:grovertoot: is actually a relatively recent addition to the groverhaus saga because someone noticed a few years ago that there was an odd pipe sticking out of the side of the shed in the background of the iconic picture where he's standing thigh deep in a sewage mess of his own creation. that pvc pipe sticking out was connected to a generator exhaust on the other side.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



document review is one of the only jobs many lawyers can get and is mind numbing and tedious but so far hasn't been algorithmically replaced. once that happens a non-trivial percentage of lawyers are going to be added to the already impressive glut of unemployed lawyers.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



Jonny 290 posted:

i could write about 20 lines of VCL to block nazis on some of the web's largest platforms and have it out in 90 seconds

all you have to do for twitter is set your browser's country code response to france or germany since they already have the "is_nazi" flag available in their user api.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



i have an iphone and don't use predictive text or autocorrect and still type fast as gently caress without errors. bunch of scrubs in here with scrub rear end fingers.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



i had to stop using ios autocorrect because i manually would type in contractions and it would always convert them to we'lol or i'lol or something loving dumb like that so i just got rid of it. i rarely misspell when typing so it never did anything other than frustrate me.


on loving osx too having to go back and change the word i typed 3-4 loving times because it keeps correcting it to something else.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



like seriously if you have half decent spelling just ditch autocorrect entirely.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



H.P. Hovercraft posted:

how many did the president lose

someone in another thread said a million but i bet it’s exactly equal to the number banned.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



i thought it roughly went boomers 45-65, X was 65-85, millennial from 85-05, and whatever the current generation is started in 05.

also :lol: at stymie and people still getting stymied in tyool 2018. today’s stymieing was vintage 2012.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



President Beep posted:

if it helps i blew my posting budget on that.

jk. my posting budget is very well funded

i, too, have a high fiber diet.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



Tokamak posted:

it'd be cool to get one of those as a cultural artefact... for maybe $10

gently caress that get it for the press, rig it up to some sort of controller so you can dial it in, and boom you have a monstrously strong although small press for any of your smashing needs.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



Pittsburgh Fentanyl Cloud posted:

Some people have a short attention span and can't be asked to participate in things that don't involve bright flashing colors and constant action, and that's okay. We're all capable in our own way.

lol

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



ArmZ posted:

wonder how much this product placement cost them

pepsi basically funded that movie based on all their brands representation.

Mr. Nice! fucked around with this message at 17:07 on Mar 26, 2018

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



had to go look that one up and no she’s not. his daughter’s scenes where mostly cut but she does appear as basically an extra in a few places.

https://movies.stackexchange.com/questions/10113/who-is-the-daughter-of-john-spartan-in-demolition-man

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



Krankenstyle posted:

my Facebook download was a couple hundred megs, and obvs 90% was the photos (which are compressed, pretty sure you can't get the originals back)

how do you even generate that much

same. mine was pretty small they have basically nothing in there at all except things i personally have uploaded.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



tori thanks for the heads up about pcos bill its always fun to laugh at a permabanned nazi.

a few gip posters used to eat probations all the time in tfr for calling out bill for being a nazi until his rants finally got him permabanned.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



it was pages back but people were discussing zuck buying houses around his so he could make a compound. that’s not all that uncommon for rich fucks. ufc president dana white made his fortune after getting ran out of boston by whitey bulger and then teamed up with union busting mobster casion owners that for some reason were the least corrupt and most competent team in the fight business.

he got complaints from other rich people in his neighborhood that his backyard waterslide and other such things were violating the hoa so he bought all his neighbors houses and bulldozed them.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



lawyers, doctors, and other such professionals are also exempted from overtime laws.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



H.P. Hovercraft posted:

a buddy of mine used to work for a porn store that sold amyl nitrite as “video head cleaner” and he was supposed to throw anyone out that specifically requested it as “poppers”

that might’ve been as a compliance effort toward the louisiana sodomy laws at the time tho

i watched a friend get kicked out of a sex shop just a couple of weeks ago because he asked for them as poppers. it was on a mutual friend's birthday, and the memory of that moment is the best bday present he could have gotten her. it was loving magical.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



why doesn’t musky fly everywhere in a helo is easily answered because helicopters are death machines acting in defiance of the laws of gravity and are excruciatingly uncomfortable and prone to mishap.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford




there’s a gag in a new episode of curb where larry’s driving ted danson’s new tesla and gets a ticket for aggressively beeping a cop. later in the episode ted danson gets beat up for a likewise aggressive beep in his tesla.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford




gently caress yeah!

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



Endless Mike posted:

nah, in a 5-4 decision, SCOTUS will strike it down saying it's freedom of speech to work for sub-minimum wages and no benefits

not necessarily. i haven't looked at the decision itself, but depending on whether it's decided entirely on california law or not, it might not be reviewable at all by the scotus.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



Endless Mike posted:

i'll admit i'm not terribly familiar with how this works, but in scanning through the decision, the first thing they mention is both ca and fed law, and they mention multiple cases from outside ca (but many within), so idk

sourcing from outside law for precedence isn’t the same as whether a case rests on federal law or not. if they were interpreting a california statute that doesn’t conflict with or is not superseded by any federal law then there is no further appellate review.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



ate all the Oreos posted:

yeah to be clear I agree with you, i'm just saying that even with all the limitations they do the best they can and i think people poo poo on them unfairly i guess :shrug:


yeah totally, long before voter ID was even being discussed, florida adopted standards for new ID issuance that basically makes it impossible to get one in a lot of cases. here's what you need to bring to get a photo ID:


if you were missing any of this, or (more likely) you brought one that didn't quite count, or you thought you only needed to bring one proof of address rather than two different ones, too bad you waited in line for nothing, go home and try again next time!

in florida's defense, this was in response to the real id act and they were technically following the federal guidelines to the letter. the new florida ids and drivers licenses, however, are one and done. once you have one that's real id compliant, you no longer will ever need to bring in all the pile of paperwork again to renew/replace.

also depending on circumstances, they will work with you. granted the majority of the flexibility i've ever found was with the mobile dmv bus that they'd bring to the annual homeless/at-risk veteran standdown.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



ate all the Oreos posted:

yeah except florida eagerly jumped on the real ID train very early, it was one of the first states to do so iirc, that's always seemed a bit, idk, suspicious to me.

e: and they might make exceptions now but when this was first rolled out i definitely remember they made a HUGE deal about how there would never be any exceptions ever because terrorisms or something, it was all very dumb

nah if you're at a dmv or tax collector they rarely will ever make exceptions. i've had to turn around and come back multiple times in the past, myself. the only time i've seen them make exceptions was specifically in the (seriously just had to look up the name florida license on wheels) FLOW bus when working with our legal team to get veterans their licenses back.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



Sagebrush posted:

I don't know. I just got a Real ID (tm) in California and I only had to bring one thing proving my address, and bank statements or credit card statements were acceptable, and that's a document a hell of a lot more poor people will have than an insurance policy document or a loving property deed

they take absolutely any mail with your name and the address on it in florida, a residential lease, a utility bill, etc. the most onerous part, at least for me dealing with vets, is getting birth certificates from other states.

florida requires one time now for new ids/licenses - official birth certificate, proof of ssn (via ss card, w2, or a few other things), and two proofs of address. this can be any mail, utility bill, lease, contract, or otherwise official document that lists the address.

transferring title on vehicles has actually been the place i personally have gotten hung up the most and mostly because of odometer statements.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



some people in the gip current events thread aren’t happy i said elon musk is a huckster backed by bloodmoney.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



not a big fan of lacroix personally.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



haveblue posted:

yeah, that's where all the attention is going. any traditional ads the kids aren't already blocking with technological measures like dvrs and adblock they just ignore in favor of their phone or mentally discard by reflex

its not just kids. i'm a single guy in his mid 30s relatively flush with cash and i do as much as possible to avoid all direct-advertisements. i don't listen to radio, i have adblock on my phone/computer, i pay for hulu no-ads, and anytime youtube or something forces an ad on me I change tabs/mute my computer and just wait for it to be done.

i watched a new episode of archer via fxnow and it was horrible. a 21 minute show had over 10 minutes of commercials and they kept cycling through the same ones over and over.

advertising is a cesspool.

also here's where pagan cow comes in and crows about product placement and how no one can ever be truly ad free, but at the same time idgaf about a coke in a tv show and would rather see the wayne's world style nascar product placement than any amount of commercials.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



watching live sports is about the only time i see commercials and holy poo poo they're awful garbage.

Sagebrush posted:

a while back i saw some eye-tracking heatmaps made while people browsed a news website covered in ads, and it's unbelievable how good people are at ignoring anything but the content. like they don't even have to glance at the ads to recognize what they are -- just automatically filtered out as they scan down the page.

i think it's probably a repurposing of evolved abilities that aren't greatly needed any more. like, there's some bit of your brain that evolved to scan over a field of grass and ignore everything that isn't tiger-shaped, but now in the absence of tigers it's what lets you unconsciously skip over web ads and instantly recognize a police car lurking a mile down the road

sounds about right. the human brain is dope af and we have a long ways to go to mimic it even remotely.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



Munkeymon posted:

"the kids" being anyone under ~40 IME

yeah basically millennials and younger. it's odd to call myself a millennial, but it helps in this case. most gen-x i find do not have the same complete aversion to ads and commercials like i do.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



qirex posted:

yeah but you have brand preferences already, the 13-24 is so valuable because if you get someone buying gilette razors or downy fabric softener or general motors cars when they're 20 there's a good chance they'll keep doing it for 50 years

if you're over 35 your only ad value is financial services, medical/pharma and home improvement

its fun to see the different commercials on cable depending on the time of day and what's being shown.

i think i'm in a bit of a unique situation, though, because i did all of this in my early 20s as well then joined the navy and basically isolated myself from any mass media just by virtue of work for almost a decade, and then continued as a curmudgeon after.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



when i last routinely watched any tv with commercials, girls gone wild was still relatively new and was 75% of the advertising on comedy central and adult swim.

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



ate all the Oreos posted:

don't worry they passed an updated version of the law to make sure such an unjust tragedy never happens again - the burden of proof now rests on the prosecution to prove the shooting wasn't self-defense, which is automatically assumed true

it's not exactly that, but pretty close. basically the reasonably apprehension of fear is presumed to be present anytime a person is in a place they are legally allowed to be that's covered by the law (such as home or vehicle). as no one was trying to break into dunn's vehicle while he was in it (the kids he shot at were in an suv with child locks on the door and couldn't have got out of the back seat anyways) he would not have had the shelter of the automatic presumption.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mr. Nice!
Oct 13, 2005

c-spam cannot afford



Munkeymon posted:

"he could not have known there were child locks and so..."

for the vehicle exception to work, someone has to actually be trying to get into the vehicle. it doesn't cover you from shooting from one car into another.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply