Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Dunno if this got linked already but it deserves a redo if so because of the strong message: https://mobile.twitter.com/PeoplesMomentum/status/1167369049220767745

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Gonzo McFee posted:

Depressing that all it takes to distract the press from us hurtling off the edge of a no deal cliff for no reason other than bare stupidity is them buying a loving dog.

The cynic in me wonders if them getting the dog was purely a publicity stunt...

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Failed Imagineer posted:

Bloody Stupid Johnson

How is this name not more common for him??

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Borrovan posted:

Her CLP voted no confidence in her, and she's deselected herself for the next GE (presumably jumping before getting pushed, and freeing herself up to act like an arse in the meantime knowing there's nothing more the party can do)
https://mobile.twitter.com/KateHoeyMP/status/1148198081143476225

Would this take effect for a snap election though?

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

It just occured to me that with the expulsion of the Tory rebels, the Conservative party now has less seats in the Commons than they won in the 2010 election.
Even better, if the libdems joined the tory coalition of chaos, they still would not have a majority...

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006


:eyepop:

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Rupert of Hentzau posted:

The Speaker is an MP who is elected to the position by other MPs. They immediately resign their existing party membership upon taking the post, and by convention none of the other parties stand candidates against them in general elections in order to preserve the neutrality of the position and to let the Speaker do their job of governing the house in a reasonably even-handed manner -- they can't do it properly if they're worrying that smacking down one party for constantly flouting procedure is going to result in their being out of a job come election time. Historically this has meant that the Speaker is Speaker until such time as they decide not to be and resign, at which point there is an election for a new Speaker.

Bercow as Speaker is a interesting, though; he was a Tory MP who started out on the right of the party, but his wife is a Labour member and appears to have had a moderating effect on his opinions over the years. He was elected Speaker as a sort of compromise candidate, since the other Tory candidates were frothing lunatics and Labour knew they didn't have the votes to put one of their own party in the chair, so they threw their weight behind Bercow as the lesser evil. The other part of this is that Bercow is an absolutely colossal narcissist -- even more so than your typical MP -- and loves putting on a performance for the cameras.

Put those two things together and you end up with an unexpectedly proactive Speaker who is willing to go out of his way to poo poo on the government whenever it gets out of line, even though it's a Tory government and he's an ex-Tory. Some of the things he's done have been without precedent, but hardly against the rules since the Speaker is the person who gets to decide what a lot of the rules are -- or at least how they are interpreted.

And now that the government is into full-on fascist mode and they're ignoring parliamentary conventions left right and centre, they've also figured that now is the time for a reckoning with Bercow. They can't make him give up the Speaker's chair and even if they win a majority in the next election he could still make life very difficult for them, so they're going to try to unseat him as an MP and install somebody who'll wave through all of their bullshit without a second thought.

I've been wondering, how do the constitencies that have been represented by a speaker feel about that representation? It seems like they get shafted a bit by not having an MP who can fully support them in parliament and also historically having less choice on who to vote for due to the convention of the major parties not fielding candidates there (that the tories are about to start ignoring).

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Diet Crack posted:

Sounds about right, she looks like a miserable, dull piece of work - if pictures can paint a thousand words. The quip about enjoying fighting with her spouse says it all really. (20 years of marriage counselling, poor bastard.)

20 sessions, not years.

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Beefeater1980 posted:

JFC people and dismissing statistics. Uber’s hilariously evil business practices aside, if you think app-based ride hailing , where every ride is traceable, is more likely to have unreported crime than some dude in a Xiali who picks up a customer from the roadside, you’re hugely wrong. Not every taxi driver on the planet is a London cabbie, and not all regulation has the intention or effect of improving standards.

I’m also not aware of any evidence that people are reluctant to report crime on minicabs or ride hailing cars - which makes sense, because it would be insane to not report someone assaulting or mugging you just because it was an Uber or Ola driver or whatever.

I mean if you want to argue against the gig economy go right ahead, there are plenty of good reasons, but “more safety” isn’t an accurate reason to prefer licensed taxis.

All that traceable ride data is in the hands of a psychotic company who has absolutely no desire to portray themselves in any negative light whose preferred method of dealing with driver crime is for their riders to rate the drivers a one.

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Guavanaut posted:

So what you're saying is that we should nationalize Uber and make the anonymized data public and the code open source?

Well of course. (They already operate at a loss subsidising their rides so they're basically a public utility already :v:)

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

One of the aye votes for an election was tory turned cuk turned libdem Sarah Wollaston - not even any of the Labour regular suspects voted yes (aside from a couple of Labour quitters). Even Jo Johnson abstained from the vote...

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Bobby Deluxe posted:


If you want to get into it, call out his circular reasoning and the fact that we can't stockpile insulin, no international trade deal has ever been completed in under 5 months and any insulin coming from the US would (A) be out of date by the time it was shipped here and (B) bankrupt us because of US healthcare prices. Type A diabetics (for whom the condition is genetic, so no stereotypes blaming weight here) are going to loving die because of this.


Project Fear at play once again, plucky Britain will persevere through any hardships emposed by the nefarious EU thanks to Blitz Spirit.

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

bump_fn posted:

who plays the space turtle

Mitch Mcconnell.

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

https://twitter.com/iainjwatson/status/1175337108942262272

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Renaissance Robot posted:

I'm struggling to parse wtf this tweet is trying to say but either way it seems like an overreaction? How does Watson staying or not really have any significant effect on our chances at a GE?

weak FLIPFLOPPING labour unable to stick to a position

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

kecske posted:

uh isn't he the most successful opposition leader in UK history? also I googled effete and it says it means effeminate and I'm not sure thats a cool thing to say

no but corbyn bad (hasnt cancelled brexit)/(is preventing brexit from happening) [delete inapplicable option] antisemitic

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006



chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Won't more like can't - in all fairness it's not like even he knows himself how many he's got...

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

The Green New Deal has been approved by a massive majority :toot:

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

feedmegin posted:

Na.

.22 is far too small a calibre to be reliable. 5.56mm NATO

Isn't .22 a bigger calibre than 5.56mm NATO as it was based on .202? (Or is this a joke that I'm not getting?)

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Haha no break for youuuuu!

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

Jaeluni Asjil posted:

In the UK there's a difference between 'further education' and 'higher education'.
'Further' is post-16 and 'Higher' post-18. (Generally. There are exceptions to everything.)

In 'further' this may be students who are moving on from school to do A-levels etc at a college, or more vocational subjects.
Higher education takes place in Universities and is where you get your bachelors, masters, PhDs and a few other rare things.

Some universities are 'collegiate' eg Oxford, Cambridge, London, and a few others, where you study at a college of the university. Eg London University has Imperial, Queen Mary, University College, Goldsmiths, Royal Holloway and a bunch of others. Basically, they are like federations. There have been a lot of mergers in the past 35-40 years and some have lost their identity completely. Eg Queen Mary WAS Queen Mary College. Then it was Queen Mary & Westfield. Now it is Queen Mary (without the college bit). Westfield College has gone to the great library in the sky never to be heard of again.

There used to be things called Polytechnics as well, they did offer degrees but often in more vocational / technical subjects. These converted to Universities back in the late 80s I think. There was a lot of snobbery against 'red brick' universities (new ones) and the traditional ones that could trace origins back several hundred years.

Imperial left University of London in 2007 for some reason.

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

The point is the brexit referendum was a piece of poo poo bad faith referendum called by an idiot trying to resolve internal party politics.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

chestnut santabag
Jul 3, 2006

mediadave posted:

True - but the Labour party policy is that we accept the outcome.

Yeah and that's the compromise - negotiate a deal but then have it confirmed by a proper referendum not organised by a clownshoes outfit.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply