Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo
I thought Boris would be safe forever because you wouldn't be able to find someone worse to replace him

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Mebh posted:

Or the crowning glory. A 0 bedroom 0 bathroom place (is it a cupboard?) on the 4th floor (remember, no elevators or ac) in the attic for 279k! But you get partial use of the neighbouring attic space for storage. Yay.



I'm gonna just move to chile or something I think.

How is it an apartment if there's no bedroom in it

I think "partial use of the neighbouring attic space" might be all you get there.

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo
Or maybe "partial use of the neighbouring attic space" is a euphemism for where to poo poo? I dunno

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Guavanaut posted:

I think the one with no bedrooms, one bathroom, and shared space is just you living in someone else's flat's bath.

It's like the gig economy only someone wakes you by pissing in your face every morning

It's like the gig economy

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Guavanaut posted:

Johnson has poo poo heir

She is gaffe-prone and tin-eared while Starmer offers real change

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo
she hopes the blame for disruptions lands on Labour. But rail staff have public support and two-thirds of voters back a strike by nurses.

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

quote:

During her inaugural address to departmental staff last Wednesday, Suella Braverman said a top priority would be stopping all Channel crossings. She has also asked all staff to watch “trashy TV” to help their “mental wellbeing”, a source said, specifically citing Channel 4’s Married at First Sight and First Dates as well as Love Island.

The latest series of the ITV2 show drew thousands of complaints about alleged misogynistic behaviour. Last month, the charity Women’s Aid highlighted issues including bullying and coercive control.

Sources familiar with Braverman’s address revealed she told them: “It’s important for people to look after their wellbeing. Best antidote [for work-related stress] is trashy TV.”

hmm seems we've tried all the rough and tumble options except sharks, so I guess sharks it is

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo
Jeremohamed Corbyjihad

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Mebh posted:

Also my ceo announced a mandatory camera on policy for all meetings at work today across the entire company. So thats a fun thing. "it has come to our attention that some individuals are not using their webcams" fucksake. Is it 2020? This was objectively disproven to help anyone and is a massive fatigue contributor.

gently caress your ceo and anyone like them. First they turn your home into a workplace office without contributing to rent, then they demand visual access to you without paying standard camboy minute rates

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Jaeluni Asjil posted:

Landlord Mr Commode Kermode rips out tenant's bog after rent not paid.

https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/landlord-ripped-out-tenants-toilet-25082336

(this is a Reach publication so it is full of flashy whirly bits if you choose to read the article).


Unrelated (unless Sterling is being flushed down the bog)

Doesn't include 2022



Tonight (not fine enough on this chart) just 3 cents above the 1985 worst ever.

poonds confirmed gone

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo
Presumably you ask them not to serve any

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

That looks like a natural trumpet, among the flexiest instruments

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

peanut- posted:

So they’re putting the full-on austerity message out to the press now

https://twitter.com/thetimes/status/1576089975900307456

How did austerity pan out the last time around and has it been properly wound down? Not like, are they spending as much money as before they went austere, but have they reimplemented the institutions which austerity's killed off?

Is the answer no? Because I'm beginning to suspect this immensely punchable man might be less than credible on the subject he's been chosen to be the expert on

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

sinky posted:

They are doing more austerity because there are still some institutions it didn't destroy. They've got 2 years to get what's left.

that's just not very good public stewardship, at least imo. destroying social institutions - and then very likely having to build them up from nothing at a later stage - is considerably harder and more expensive than keeping them alive by alloting appropriate resources on a long-term and reliable basis.

quote:

I think it is important that we look at a state which is extremely large, and look at how we can make sure that it is in full alignment with a lower tax economy.

it's weird how the tories' pitch is always 'we want to make things worse for almost everyone' and voters either don't get that they're part of that almost everyone, or they figure that they can take it as long as it means someone else gets worse hosed than them.

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Bobby Deluxe posted:

It relies on everyone raised on Thatcherite individualism thinking "well it'll never hit me" and then by the time it does, all of the other people thinking it'll never hit them rally round to come up with reasons why its the victims fault, and coming up with completely derranged things they could have done differently, like living off porridge.

tldr: It's prions.

I'd have thought it was spite and resentment, that's a hell of a drug. individualism is mostly placebo really

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Diet Crack posted:

the ISA is only as good as the allowance goes though, if you suddenly make a mil on the markets it doesn't really matter. Personally I'd rather not have my monies in any locked in contracts with banks at the moment because *spoiler* they're going to trade it away and then tell you that you can't have it back or limit you to £50 withdrawals a month or something stupid because Banks are a cancer.

Cancer is progressive. Cancer means growth. Cancer tends to win out in the end.

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

OwlFancier posted:

I dropped my battered sausage in the car park once and I picked it back up off the tarmac and ate it, while a man in his car watched.

You could have just said you ate a twice-battered sausage.

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Marmaduke! posted:

Exactly, that stuff that Tory chairman was saying above could have actually been useful if it was "we should all be looking to reduce power consumption" instead of "Too poor to run your heater 24-7? Just get a better paid job". Of course, saying we should use less power would imply we should take action, like all that inconvenient house insulation hullabaloo...

Why don't you insulate your houses? Is it a culture war thing?

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Runcible Cat posted:

gently caress knows. I think it's a :tif: thing.

I got my loft insulated (and floored) when I moved in and I seem to be regarded as mildly weird but harmless if I mention that to people.

Ed: the house was nearly 100 years old when I bought it and no one else had bothered in all that time.

It's just... shouldn't it be common sense when you need a volume of air kept warmer than the surrounding air? Houses can be made insulated so they don't need winter heating, even here in Sweden (by accepting a lot of building constrictions, admittedly). You've got all those gas burners and fuel poverty and seem to be cold at home all the time, and still you don't use proper argon filled insulated double-glass windows?



I recall back when swedes used to live in britane they always made a point of how they had to use swedish contractors because the british just didn't know how to build houses for british conditions. "They route their water pipes on the outside of the building!", that sort of thing. It's plain weird

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Only ineffective couping is approved

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Failed Imagineer posted:

I really don't think there's any problem with people getting a few grand from their dead parents. There's often a lot of hassle dealing with estates, and providing end-of-life care can gently caress with people's careers and earning. But for sure 100% tax above a certain threshold in the low five figures seems reasonable - in a hypothetical world where the super-rich are also somehow prevented from passing on all their wealth through obscure corporate instruments

the problem is people are getting different amounts, and some people none at all. We shouldn't abolish inheritance, but socialise it

100% proof to fox news outrage pieces

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

I hope every one of them texts her saying "yes i'll be there 100% can't miss!!" from the train back home

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

I'm working on a chrome extension that changes all text occurences of (spaces included) "James Cleverly " to "James, Cleverly " and "James Cleverly, " to "James, Cleverly, "

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Tesseraction posted:

It is rather interesting to be run by someone who is genuinely dumb as poo poo. Normally it's overconfident in their intellect, not outright stupid.

Always evil though.

who's got the greater delta between self-assumed and actual competence between her and boris though

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo
is it too soon for you to go back to boris and if it isn't, would it be a step up or down

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

peanut- posted:

Apparently Truss’s meeting with Tory MPs last night was such a catastrophe that they are now openly discussing bringing Boris back as the only viable option. So yeah it’s definitely on the table.

That's amazing. He'd be so smug to be back, he'd gently caress upp even worse than last time

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Failed Imagineer posted:

Requesting a nonce report on both Bloc Party and The Stroks

strokes

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Gonzo McFee posted:

"unintended consequences" like their property development mates getting mad at them.

Aren't like all your politicians landlords themselves

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Government reps hiding from media because of ignorance of what government policy will be tomorrow isn't silly?

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo
Extrapolating from the trend, I'll be appointed chancellor within six months and sacked before anyone bothers to tell me about it

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo
Someone didn't use his noreply address so Liz just pressed reply and didn't bother loading or deleting the graphics at the bottom.

The alternative is dumber

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Scientastic posted:

Analyst on the BBC saying this is a “strategic move”

I’m not sure she knows what strategic means

The strategy is Jeremy Hunt's campaign to be PM

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Spangly A posted:

The MSP absolutely hosed that and very clearly didn't even read the citizens advice site on how pip is scored before deciding to do the claim by the only method that allows the dwp to lie without getting caught.

I mean she probably thought she was just helping out a family who didn't have a phone, and didn't expect to be dancing on egg shells to the tune of a hostile bureaucracy. That shouldn't be an unreasonable expectation really

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Tesseraction posted:

Also the infantilisation of saying they can't do it because they grew up in a benefits house and therefore never learned to do it.

Really hope the person on the other end of the phone treads on lego until they die of natural causes.

One of the benefits of modern commercial bureaucratic practise is to decouple the process of decision-making from personhood. You don't feel much pain if you're a lightly edited hard pressure sales script with four hours of video lectures covering the theoretical basis of elaborated post-industrial poverty theory

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

sinky posted:

Maybe not unreasonable if a friend/family member was trying to help.
But they are an MSP, if they aren't aware how evil the DWP is then they haven't been paying attention for the past decade+.

Sure, even I would know better than to call the DWP in good faith. But like, you should be able to help out with a phone call to a government agency even if you're a (presumably) well-intentioned, though naive and gullible, politician.

e: nevermind

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Spangly A posted:

Absolutely agree. It is still very frustrating to watch people make the decision to rely on human decency and empathy when dealing with people who have none. The fact it's a member of parliament who made a choice not to delegate a task she wasn't remotely capable of, with a vulnerable persons financial security on the line, is giving me an unpleasant feeling that I don't think is solely just spillover from my opinions on the DWP itself.

It's not an unreasonable expectation for anyone except a member of parliament with an entire paid staff for constituency surgery work. It feels like giving someone bad medical or legal advice. I've done rep work, acted as a McKenzie friend, done dozens of dwp claims and two ECHP writeups. I simply can't understand being this unprepared when someone trusts me to represent them.

I'm sure you're right about all of that, but even the distant idea of that being necessary for vulnerable people to receive help fills me with black despair.

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo
what about IDS

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Apraxin posted:

Take up the White Man's burden, have done with childish days
https://twitter.com/NotABigJerk/status/1582330801819381762

social mobility tsar

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

serious gaylord posted:

The home Secretary got sacked 4 hours ago and its not even front page news

lmao your politics is just insane

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tijuana Bibliophile
Dec 30, 2008

Scratchmo

Seth Pecksniff posted:

that's saying something!

it's really not

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply