|
oiseaux morts 1994 posted:Not at all, I think progressing from 9 to 13 to 19 is good. Each board size introduces new concepts that might overwhelm if you rush straight into 19. 9 games are short and many so you develop an eye for atari, life and death and fighting; 13 teaches you enclosures, extensions and moyos. You then combine the two in 19 with a grasp of the fundamentals. That sounds smart. I just started and have only played 19x19. I start off okay and can do small-scale stuff okay, but after a while I get fatigued trying to keep track of things since I don't have the experience to grasp what's occurring on a strategic level. Note to self: start smaller literally.
|
# ¿ Jan 17, 2014 22:42 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 09:35 |
|
oiseaux morts 1994 posted:Quick rundown of major issues: Thanks for the analysis. I'm playing two games against Uranus now. I'm not doing well, although hopefully I do better than that guy did. Really instructive to see specific examples of advice like this.
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2014 16:28 |
|
xopods posted:General comments: On turn 13 white attaches to attack black's premature invasion. What would a better point of attack have been, and why? O3? N4? L2? My guess would be N4, since it'd push black toward the edge more. I'm just unsure where to go to ensure the black group is pulverized rather than carving out a chunk of territory. e: learned how to select other review lines, saw that you listed O5. Got it. Sacrifice some territory to create better walls around other territory?
|
# ¿ Feb 3, 2014 19:34 |
|
uranus posted:sweeeet Sorry I'm taking forever in our game. Prediction: You win by a lot.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2014 17:19 |
|
I'll be rock-climbing. Shame, I'd be kinda interesting in seeing a pro-game breakdown.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2014 22:59 |
|
silvergoose posted:And then comparing to me, who can play a few chords, comparing to someone who has never touched a string instrument. Makes sense. If that's the metaphor we're using then I'm hitting the bottom of an empty paint can with a stick and still failing to make noise.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2014 00:09 |
|
I'm playing my first 19x19 against uranus right now, and half the time I'll analyze 500 different move combinations and permutations to find the best move to make, and the other half I'm like "that's not very fun" and I just kinda play the move that 'feels' right even if it ends up being stupid because it's just a game and why not.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2014 19:17 |
|
xopods posted:Don't think too much until you're 15k or so, just play what seems reasonable to you at the time and see how it turns out, and then watch stronger players play to absorb some intuition for the flow of the game by osmosis. It's simply impossible to understand Go at all until you have a bunch of hands-on experience.
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2014 02:09 |
|
uranus posted:any day is good for me! Pander play a move >:[ sorry! I'm State of Decaying.
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2014 03:19 |
|
xopods posted:Welcome to the game, and to a lifetime of addiction. No crap. this idea has made me kinda paralyzed when it comes to taking stones because I keep thinking "what if this is what they WANT me to do?"
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2014 16:23 |
|
I keep going through those videos. They're both relaxing and informative!
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2014 21:59 |
|
pointsofdata posted:if black just plays c1 what can white do about it? feel like i'm missing something
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2014 21:00 |
|
*files everything oiseaux just said under holy poo poo I will never be good at this game*
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2014 14:26 |
|
Kheldragar posted:Think like that, and you'll end up being those kgs players who have thousands of games yet remain at 15-18k. Better than thousands of games and still at 30k, which is pretty much the trajectory my training is taking me! The live game with uranus was plenty fun. I just get annoyed because I think I have a decent strategic mind for "where am I strong, where is he strong, where are we weak, where should I generally go", but the tactics of cordoning off groups, LoD, responding to invasions? I am absolute poo poo at those tactical skirmishes so far unless I'm given so much time I can try planning for EVERY local possibility. In the live game, Uranus just ate me alive because I could never effectively control what I thought I had controlled.
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2014 14:34 |
|
I don't get problems very well if they're more than one move. Like if it's "black to move" I'll place something, and then people here seem to know what to put for white but I don't.
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2014 18:29 |
|
Kheldragar posted:I beat Oiseaux in a 0.5 komi game by 0.5 points! You care way too much about winning and ranking. It seems to go a bit beyond just "self-improvement" and kinda moves into epeen waving. Just enjoy the games maybe?
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2014 01:46 |
|
xopods posted:Actually, W6, W26, W28 and W36 are all game-losing moves. Every time you allow Black to hane at the head of two like that you're committing a blunder on the order of 15 points or so. Black hadn't hane'd at move 5 though, had he? What would have been the proper response to the constant black invasions at 3-3? Also: Apologies to khel. I just feel there'd been a bunch of posts about rankings and how important it was to get them. Annoyed me kinda.
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2014 03:07 |
|
xopods posted:You seem to be losing the plot a lot. You start something in an area and then appear to forget what you were trying to accomplish and just go start something else. It may seem like high-level players tenuki at random, but it's never really at random. There are basically two reasons to tenuki: (c) Pander has no idea what he's doing and just plays a stone elsewhere just cause.
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2014 19:50 |
|
Kheldragar posted:ITGO league game one for aeroplane: Neat game. The early-mid game where you keep leapfrogging all over the middle was pretty incomprehensible to me. I love your terror of ko fights.
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2014 01:13 |
|
Gorgy.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2014 21:46 |
|
uranus posted:http://online-go.com/game/523935 He beat me by like 170 points after granting me 9 stones, so you didn't do that bad.
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2014 04:01 |
|
goodness posted:So she played at T19, which took away the extra space that was preventing White from taking it? Wow. That's a pretty brutal mistake.
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2014 06:15 |
|
Zekky posted:Well I ended up playing a handicap game with a 13k goon, I lost badly but Xombar reviewed the game afterwards so it was an edifying experience in the end. I'm a true 30k. I'm Pander on OGS.
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2014 01:03 |
|
Uncle Jam posted:If you're a beginner just play as fast as you can until you absolutely can't stand that your stones are getting eaten all the time. That's the time to ask for a review. It's so hard for me to play that style. Stupid being a perfectionist
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2014 15:17 |
|
Zekky posted:How do you properly respond to an invasion? I keep losing to them even if it's behind a well developed wall, for example white placing around G7 in the image below (assuming the edges of the board are where the image cuts off): That particular territory seems kinda large, like the whole goddamn board...not sure how to respond to that.
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2014 00:58 |
|
Kheldragar posted:Are we missing the part where he says "Assuming the edges of the board are where the picture cuts off"? That'd kinda make sense. If that's the case, then you pretty much couldn't kill G7 before it could form at least two eyes, it's too far to the black strength.
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2014 02:11 |
|
I'm 30k but I'm like 99% sure there's no guaranteed way to kill white there since your influence is just too far away to kill. Limit, yes, but kill no.
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2014 02:33 |
|
so I haven't played in about 6 months or so. I'm about to get off a project that, coincidentally, has consumed my life for the last 6 months. I was always 30k on OGS but now it's listed me as 21k. Huh. I guess it assumed I was practicing on my own or something. Anyways, hopefully I can get back in the swing of things, I miss getting curbstomped by people a lot better at this than me.
|
# ¿ Oct 9, 2014 17:43 |
|
o.m. 94 posted:OGS ranking system is fine, everyone is offset about 2 ranks from KGS What if you ONLY lose when you play?
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2014 16:04 |
|
AdorableStar posted:Also if you imagine the shape of the corner after both hane's have been played, it's clearly the vital point. You don't even need to visualise white 2 and 4, just the black stones extending to the edge of the board. I am idiot, but the gist of this is that the most important move for black to make is to play A18 or B18 to ensure two eyes before C3 or A16?
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 03:11 |
|
AdorableStar posted:A18 is the shape move for easy life, yes. Just imagine that double table shape. What's double table shape mean?
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2014 17:56 |
|
o.m. 94 posted:Here is the corrected image. Best of luck, D18, G19?
|
# ¿ Oct 29, 2014 19:19 |
|
I was thinking "Well, I've only won one 19x19 ever, and it was thanks to a handicap of 6, so maybe for my first random 19x19 I should set a range of 18k-25k. That should work to ensure I get someone roughly on par with me." http://online-go.com/game/1084900 I never thought curb-stomping a player could feel more shameful or boring. If it weren't for some rudimentary logic and chat, I'd have thought I was facing a random bot. I think I'm going to set a minimum of like 22k from now on.
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 17:37 |
|
I had no incentive to play well. I just wanted it to end
|
# ¿ Nov 12, 2014 17:47 |
|
xopods posted:Pander is not 15-16k. Capturing with N15 at move 24 is a move that should be automatic for a player that level. After about 10 moves I wasn't making moves with precision. I was just trying to make them fast enough to ensure he couldn't time me out. Later on I left my own groups in atari for no reason other than that I knew he wouldn't take them (whether because he didn't feel like it or didn't notice them I can't say). Look at my games with Uranus if you want to see what's closer to my level.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 15:54 |
|
SD? It was byo-yumi.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 16:59 |
|
AdorableStar posted:So how does he time you out? My lovely internet timing me out.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2014 17:24 |
|
uranus posted:have any of you done 'malkovitch' games? i'm thinking of trying one but am not sure how much i'll get out of it since most of my moves are made because 'it looks like a goodish spot' In a game I did against Oiseaux a few months ago I made a few malkovich journal entries when I was planning something. It didn't work out, so the journal entry just makes me look kinda dumb.
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2014 01:29 |
|
AdorableStar posted:I'm just saying that telling people not to go over pro games because they "can't understand them" is a lovely attitude to have. He didn't say that at all. You're just an rear end in a top hat. I feel the exact same as him: I don't understand why pros play what they do, but it's still fun to watch.
|
# ¿ Dec 25, 2014 01:41 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 09:35 |
|
xopods posted:I'd assumed he was just responding to sarcasm with sarcasm, but yeah, I was working on a book at one point with help from James Sedgwick (6d amateur I ran into a lot at tournaments). I had also gotten He Xiaoren (a pro) to say she'd take a look at the draft when it was done, but eventually I realized I had to start doing something with my time that was going to make more than $0 so I kind of gave up. On page one. About to go to a movie so I can't continue, but I rather like the opening analogy. Easy to read so far.
|
# ¿ Dec 31, 2014 02:27 |