|
SKY COQ posted:Haha gently caress, Cryptic are discontinuing the Mac client. WELP. It was pretty loving unstable.
|
#
¿
Feb 4, 2016 22:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 06:52 |
|
|
Cutedge posted:Wasn't there unofficial one that just wrapped the client in an application? Was that the WINE one? This describes both the official and unofficial client. Also gently caress restarting every 4 hours to do contra.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2016 00:19
|
|
|
Some how one of my characters has their starship trapped in a bizarre limbo where it can't be readied (or dry docked). Any ideas? I tried commissioning and decommissioning a new ship. EDIT: I was able to dismiss it. I'm getting a "C-Store is disabled" message, but if that clears up I'll try to buy it back. wdarkk fucked around with this message at 01:03 on Feb 5, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2016 00:48
|
|
|
I'm hoping they give the sci vessels sensor analysis again.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 8, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
Wide angle torps are available from the dildoship, the 2500Z Assault Cruiser, anywhere else?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 8, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
Pubbies fukkin love big cruisers.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2016 03:36
|
|
|
Asimo posted:Pubbies loving love Command spec ships for some reason too. Saw lots of complaints about the fed carrier being Intel. I talked about this earlier. It's because things like bombing run don't scale, so they don't scale down, which benefits people who are terrible players.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2016 04:24
|
|
|
Asimo posted:Flagship stats are up. Not going to bother pasting since they're pretty much copy-pastes with the usual T6 +1 console/power. Is sensor analysis with only 2 tac consoles still worthwhile? It feels like in this era of FAW-spamming balls of enemies sensor analysis isn't as useful.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 19:28
|
|
|
Tuskin38 posted:http://www.arcgames.com/en/games/star-trek-online/news/detail/9797693 This could be really good. Even if they gently caress it up, it'll probably still be a net improvement.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
I'm 100% convinced this will make tac captains even further above the other two. Also I'm "looking forward" to everyone putting all their points in the space tac tree.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2016 20:49
|
|
|
MikeJF posted:Oh god threatening stance is going to mean even more Tankbuild pubbies. I'll use it just to make sure i'm getting Reciprocity.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2016 03:15
|
|
|
SKY COQ posted:They're already complaining that it's not in the Engineering tree.  Pubbies gonna pub.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2016 03:30
|
|
|
Technical Analysis posted:What's the gist of the fix? What got hosed the hardest? Probably Attack Pattern Beta.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2016 21:18
|
|
|
I'm not even sure that's in the top 5 problems with STO though.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2016 20:43
|
|
|
A Fancy Bloke posted:drat now I'm curious what everyone's top 5 problems with this game are. Hmm. 1. Every loving thing about queues 2. The delta between a "correct" and "incorrect" build is huge 3. The game never loving tells you how to do a correct build (hell, if you look at the default loadout for many ships, it does the opposite) 4. PVP (pretty sure it's still dead) 5. Grind
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2016 21:51
|
|
|
Asimo posted:My main's an engineer and I don't really regret it since it's not like the game is really hard or something, but it's obnoxious to think that I could be doing 50%+ more damage with no appreciable downside if I did tac instead. You think it'd be trivially easy to add some team buffs or a damage boost to a skill or something to make the class worth it, but Cryptic. But Engineer is the tanking class! And Science is the ??????? class. And an Engineer in a Cruiser is tankiest of them all.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 10, 2016 01:32
|
|
|
I'd be totally up for some sort of "random dungeon a la Diablo" except in space. Then you call that exploration clusters. Except they'd gently caress it up bad.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 13, 2016 01:29
|
|
|
Aleth posted:One day we'll be fighting Q. That'll make the anniversary awkward.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 28, 2016 22:03
|
|
|
Dat mk x rear torp. Is.. is that a common rear torp? Possibly the one that was in that spot when they got the ship?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2016 22:20
|
|
|
Bloodly posted:Science I understand; They usually have the turn to use torpedoes(Even if they lack the slots to do much that's fancy with them). I'm presuming that a single torpedo is going in that fourth forward slot. Nothing, because they'd fill the slot with a beam. There's probably enough power/drain resistance to run ten beams if you somehow could.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
SKY COQ posted:It's got the phaser point defence console, which might actually be pretty useful next time there's a shuttle weekend. Didn't that get nerfed?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2016 00:43
|
|
|
AfroSquirrel posted:Don't forget the recent Green Lantern/JJTrek crossover. Maybe we'll get a return to TNG x X-Men? Check Patrick Stewart's linkedin. EDIT: Whoa, they deleted it.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2016 19:16
|
|
|
Dual Pistols are among the best-looking weapons.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 27, 2016 00:51
|
|
|
Tuskin38 posted:Oh yeah, tomorrow is May 5th. Get a William Shatner toupee admiralty card.
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2016 23:36
|
|
|
Morglon posted:I weep for the state of humanity when people here are actually looking forward to Cryptic written Star Trek time travel stories. The best you can hope to get out of a time travel story is Back to the Future or Terminator, for different reasons obviously but Trek writing in general has rarely reached anything people would consider good. Time travel is handled much worse, Cryptic Trek writing reaches inoffensive and forgettable at the very best and Cryptic time travel writing manages to excavate an entirely new sub basement of bad writing and people are looking forward to that. I mean I am here sperging pretty hard about that and yet I'm embarrassed for all of you. I mean wow, this is just so much worse than melting down over being called a space brony. Star Trek IV is good 
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2016 01:14
|
|
|
Tunicate posted:New R&D pack promo ship: Whale Probe They'd give it a power drain trait that would be either useless, busted as all hell, or mutually exclusive with plasmonic leech.
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2016 01:19
|
|
|
MikeJF posted:I wonder if the TOS 'faction' might actually be its entire own little miniature instance of the game. Its own sector space, its own maps, its own progressions, its own missions, its own STFs and Reps, no meeting 25th century. That sounds like work. I imagine they'll have a shitload of timeline contamination at some point.
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
Cutedge posted:I've said it before and I'll say it again, just make BOFFs have passives and one activatible ability, and then reduce the number of other abilities that you get. They really should streamline the poo poo out of this game. Yeah. The fact that spacebar macros exist and will sometimes span two rows of buttons indicates that there needs to be some loving reworking (which will never happen).
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2016 18:37
|
|
|
A Fancy Bloke posted:Or even Generations, if we are being honest First Contact was OK I guess but still kind of weird. Voyage Home is still the best Star Trek movie.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 20, 2016 19:06
|
|
|
I feel like if they gave you the option of continuing episodes I'd call that "pretty generous".
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
Temporal Agent has the thing that makes singularities home in on dudes, which is sort of tempting me to play this shitpile again. I probably would if they made it so you could use the grav well and tyken's rift doffs at the same time, for maximum singularity gangbang.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2016 22:51
|
|
|
Is anyone using Wine to run this POS? Supposedly it runs fine in Wine 1.9.12 but it won't work for me in 1.9.14.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 14, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
Mondian posted:Lol if Romulans are a mini faction, then I think TOS characters should be called a micro faction Coming soon, the Cardassian nano-faction and the Dominion pico-faction.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 25, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
The nacelles have no function in power generation, that's all the warp core.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 21, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
MikeJF posted:Honestly, the bigger issue than XP players (gently caress em) is Mac and Linux WINErs. Weren't those cut loose a while ago?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 4, 2016 22:25
|
|
|
Mondian posted:Although it'd be a fitting time to do that though. Its almost exactly seven years since science was good and powerful. Was that before they nerfed the consoles or a different thing? Also I will log in and play if Photonic Fleet is made great again. Was it ever great?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2017 01:40
|
|
|
Psycho Landlord posted:Help me name my stupid pizza cutter, SA. USS Domino's.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2017 05:30
|
|
|
Aleph Null posted:Why doesn't the ship interior have your DOffs anyway? It's got your BOffs and then random engineer or whatever. Probably because doffs don't have a 3d model anywhere.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 14, 2017 23:14
|
|
|
Ugh, not really drawing me back here cryptic.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 16, 2017 01:16
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 06:52 |
|
|
If the "targetable torps are immune to hazards" thing applies to NPCs, does that mean that being one-shot by invisible borg torps will come back?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 17, 2017 18:53
|
|