Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Gammatron 64 posted:

Voyager people are dumb and bad and should feel bad. Voyager people are like Doctor Who people.
Howe dare you compare awesome schlock sci-fi with loving terrible schlock sci-fi. Doctor Who is fun. Voyager is poo poo.

And as always, Deep Space 9 is the best Star Trek.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Maybe we could decompress the main shuttlebay. Blow ourselves off course.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

So I've been rewatching DS9, and Way of the Warrior is still real good, y'all.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

I once heard it described quite crudely as "Bajorans are space-Jews. Ferengi are space-Jewish-stereotypes."

But, yeah. I agree with Zurui. Go overly allegorical and you lose the weight.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Why are we talking about what The Olds of CBS will think about a show that's airing exclusively on the internet?

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

He actually makes a huge deal about never using one.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Gammatron 64 posted:

Also people can try and use the same excuses they used for Ghostbusters '16 and just calling anyone who doesn't like it a racist, sexist homophobic gamergater.
I'm seeing a lot of this in the opinionsphere and have been for several years now, but I feel like the "I'm not allowed to not like a thing with a POC actor/gay character/female lead" is used faaaaaaar more often as a deflection of actual racism/sexism/homophobia to the point that even your probably entirely earnest arrival there gives me douche chills, through no fault of yours.

My fear isn't so much your response to the rhetoric personally so much as the poisoned well. It's like bringing up the difference between pedophilia and ephebophilia. Yeah, you're technically correct that there are people who will poo poo on your opinion and dismiss your not liking the show as unexamined biases on your part based only on reacting to other, super-biased people, but bringing out the "anybody who doesn't 100% support every piece of art the SJWs have rallied behind is called called a terrible person" puts you, sadly, in a box with people who scream that the SJWs are ruining everything. And right now, that's literal Nazis, unwittingly showing great dramatic irony by claiming their hatred as free speech while demanding everybody stop talking about social issues when discussing art because it hurts their feewings.

I don't have a point to make so much as an exasperated sigh that wanting to point out that thing in art can be, socially speaking, not the best, always, always, always, starts an argument that ends, inexorably and sometimes even far away from the original two people discussing it, with a false-equivalence between people who want the world to be more inclusive, and people who think racism/sexism/homophobia aren't real and/or everybody needs to shut up about them right now.

I'm as SJW as they come, and I don't think you hated Star Trek because it had a black female lead. I do, however, know that there are hundreds of thousands between you and I who would hate every show that did, no matter the quality, so I understand some people (usually the recently woke, as there's nobody more zealous than the recently-converted) overcompensating when trying to point out those hundreds of thousands and accidentally hitting you.

It sucks that it happens, but being told you might be racist feels a lot less awful when you recognize that the person saying it is trying to rid the world of racism (however imperfectly) and the person on the other side is trying to convince people that racism doesn't exist, or worse: that it does, but it really only targets white people.

In short, you're right. It's Star Trek, and that poo poo's probably not going to fly. But I've been surprised before. Thank you for allowing me to use your post as a jumping-off point.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Oh, god dammit. I made an effortpost in the middle of one of Jeb!'s awesome poststorms.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Astroman posted:

There probably would have been organized boycotts, dropped sponsors, and a lot of stations would have refused to show the episode. A couple would probably have dropped the series.

I think today, if they tried to do a similar episode and it wasn't a male actor, they would be castigated online and there would be boycotts and dropped sponsors.
There would be a couple blog posts about how gutless it was as a half-measure and a massive campaign from the right to boycott the show for being progressive propaganda and what about the children and the gays are all pedophiles and rapists, and then there'd be peaople making false equivalences about those two things and how they're two sides of the same coin.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

HD DAD posted:

Bareil is the LaCroix of personalities
Delicious and refreshing, but maligned by people for getting popular too quickly?

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

That is absolutely the best.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Is there a game that lets you explore the Enterprise D or Deep Space Nine the way Elite Force lets you explore voyager? Because it'd be super cool to have that for a ship and crew I actually give a poo poo about.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

The best. And it isn't close.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Speaking as transitioning enby...

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

I will add a caveat that while DS9 is the worst, it only works with the groundwork the two previous series laid out. They built the house so we could cheer as it was demolished.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Peachfart posted:

This would be the equivalent of smallpox blankets to most cultures, imo
Reality television is directly responsible for America's current sentient tire fire of an administration.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Is it ever explained why the first vorta we ever see in DS9 can shoot balls of energy out of her neck? It never comes up again.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Every Star Trek but Deep Space Nine is trending on US Netflix because we continue to live in the timeline where Biff had the sports almanac that will eventually become the mirror universe.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

I thought the Gorn weren't a race and that one thing Kirk fought was called "the gorn" not "a gorn"

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

I've finally reached the



portion of my DS9 rewatch.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

JeremoudCorbynejad posted:

What do you think neelix smells like? He looks like someone who would have a "that smell"

I'm thinking pineapple that's gone off
Curry that's gone bad mixed with overpowering incense.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Cythereal posted:

On the other hand, budget. The Borg from the beginning have been infamously expensive to feature. The battle with the cube in First Contact was one of the most expensive parts of the entire movie.
Why's that? Like, more expensive than fighting a Klingon ship? I don't understand why a cube would be more expensive to shoot than any other effects shot.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

I'm nearing the end of my DS9 rewatch and Take Me Out to the Holosuite is still just the absolute best.

This show is a real gem.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

The montage in the middle of the episode that culminates with Kira catching Odo practicing umpire moves in his office just makes me smile like the dickens.

The fact that the show explored the dark side of utopia and lives in wartime for much of its latter-half makes the lighthearted episodes so, so refreshing, because with the exception of Sisko, at times (In the Pale Moonlight and Nuking planets to capture Eddington), the people of the show never sell their soul. It's Star Trek at wartime, and it's even optimistic about war, fundamentally, even if it does ask all those questions about "what if our socialist utopia was threatened and we had to do bad things?"

A bunch of characters declaring time out on war and playing an old dead game for fun and camaraderie is just <3 as gently caress. I'm really looking forward to Sisko's Eleven coming up for the same reason.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Big Mean Jerk posted:

The only thing Take Me Out... does wrong is not include Garak in some fashion, likely stealing the Vulcans’ signs from a tree in the outfield.
Dammit. Now I can't help but lament that this didn't happen.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

JeremoudCorbynejad posted:

Funnily enough I'm watching DS9 for the first time and just watched Take Me Out last night.

I do not give a single solitary poo poo about baseball, i know nothing about its rules or culture

But that episode was a whole lot of fun
Most of the characters don't know poo poo about baseball either, which is fun. I love when they're going over the more esoteric rules and are just flummoxed as all hell.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Comrade Fakename posted:

I checked out one of those Midnight’s Edge videos once and it was all about how Discovery is bad because it panders to the evil SJWs, so gently caress that guy.
How in gently caress's name does anybody grow up loving Star Trek and then demonize social justice warriors?

Star Trek has been progressive as gently caress from the word go.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Sash! posted:

Maybe, and I'm barely even going out on a limb, we simply disagree with the point they make and simply enjoy a well told story.
That can't possibly be true in these particular cases because these are people who think Star Trek has suddenly and recently gone SJW.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Real talk, it's because anti-SJWs are always okay with poo poo they hate if they saw it before they got redpilled.

They always trot out Sarah Connor and Ripley and say "why can't it be like that?" And, well, it is sometimes. And they still hate it. Because it's new, and not nestled safely in their childhood.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

What really gets me is that when people get woke, and they revisit things they love, they're openly critical of the bad things the things they love did. Like, I love Christmas Story but I can still point at its horribly racist ending and be like, "that was wrong and bad," but once people get Redpilled, they don't do that at all. They twist themselves in knots justifying why things they loved that are antithetical to their current worldview are actually okay, because reasons.

It really demonstrates the difference between the two types of thinking.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Sash! posted:

I choose this time to vent something: there's also an element that won't let you critique something without immediately claiming that you have alterior bad motives. Like in The Last Jedi, I thought Holdo was terrible. You say that and you get pounced on because you get called a sexist and have to spend your efforts defending your personal integrity rather than discussing the events of a movie that led you to question the character itself.
When tens of thousands of manchildren hate a character because she's a woman in power who doesn't immediately defer to a man who's her subordinate, maybe state your case in a way that clarifies that you are not, in point of fact, just being sexist.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Tunicate posted:

lol at basing so much of your identity off a media franchise that anyone who dislikes it has to be some kind of repulsive other
Not a single person said anything even approaching what you're arguing against here.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Sash! posted:

You can't even get to that point before you're already on the defensive about something that never happened.

I briefly thought the character was getting set up to replace Leia, which I thought was neat, but then you get this character that never really seemed to have control of the situation and never presented that she was capable of doing so (the whole "well if Leia was here" quoting made her seem like she was too busy deferring to a supposedly dead person instead of displaying confidence). Everyone always grabs on to the "she didn't need to explain it to Poe, but drat like half the ship had no idea that there was actually a plan. That's some lousy delegation.

I actually felt let down, because I had immediate high hopes of getting an interesting new character to transition from an actual dead person. Cool death tough.
See, though, you just did the thing I said you should do and I don't assume you just hate women, because you explained an actual problem you had that extended beyond "woman told man what to do."

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

The Bloop posted:

Federation food replicators are extremely culturally sensitive and also have their own prime directive: No Pizza Rules
Computer. None pizza with left beef.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

I finished my DS9 rewatch today and two tears were shed by the end, as everybody said goodbye. It was saccharine as gently caress, but they earned it.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

I don't give a gently caress if it's prestige drama or just TNG again but not lovely like Voyager so long as it takes the gently caress place after Voyager.

I'm so happy Patrick Steward is back so we can finally have the first non-prequel or reboot since Voyager ended its run.

Why is Star Trek so afraid to answer the question "cool, then what happened?"

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Julian reads as white even if he isn't. Like how Louis CK is Mexican.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Drink-Mix Man posted:

Sweet Jesus, Trek has been "deconstructing" the utopian Federation for like 20 years now. I don't want the series to just endlessly be about the dark side of paradise.
Agreed. Deep Space Nine was really all I ever needed or wanted in exploring this topic, and even it ends optimistically and falls on the side of "maybe don't do heinous poo poo just to win."

DS9 is my favorite Star Trek, but without Next Gen to set the table, it wouldn't have been interesting when DS9 upended it.

We did that, and it was great. Now can we have cool space adventures that are cool and fun and solve moral dilemmas with our optimism?

Also, stop making loving prequels.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

I mean, maybe you want Star Trek to always be asking where Spock is any time he's not on screen, but I'm ready to move forward in time.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Me too, and the novelty of it was enough to get my eighth-grade self through it and I never revisited it until I was older and, uh... yeah.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply