Erenthal posted:

#crime "dontlookhere.h"

Mercury_Storm posted:

I see the last part of the presentation is when you input your crotch into the projection device and it outputs TRUTH

Airconswitch posted:

fraud.commit()

infernal machines posted:

yeah

Powerful Two-Hander posted:

lol yes that was it

junan_paalla posted:

tldr: you got reddit crypto for getting upvoted in specific subreddits. this was devastating for the quality of the already spambot-infested crypto shitholes that chose to use it. reddit wants to IPO soon and is looking at ways to monetize the site, and surprise surprise crypto really isn't it, just use actual money instead.

predictably people have spent months relentlessly posting crypto hype articles day in day out in the hopes of a payday, and some morons bought in with real money because these things are totally going sitewide and then to the moon at some point. the price plummeted 70+% from twenty-something cents to five cents each in the hour since the announcement. you can read anger, bargaining, cope and schadenfreude from redditors in the linked discussion

FAUXTON posted:

lmao

Paladinus posted:

shackleford posted:

lmao'ing at remembering that ross ulbricht's ubuntu username was frosty

ellie the beep posted:

https://vimeo.com/62560281

it can be run on an NES

notwithoutmyanus posted:

4.5 new crimes? or 4.5 times Sam tries to speak to confess to new crimes?

Sweevo posted:

- some kind of web development (billed a guy for 7 hours work to upload a single 120MB file, asked for more money when the upload kept failing)

- bitcoin theatre (renovation plan consisted entirely of fast food equipment. thought cinemas got movies by buying them on DVD)

- custom guitar picks (thought a Creative Commons license was a thing you get, like a driver's license, which lets you ignore copyright)

- ghost TV channel (used the ghostbusters logo, thought Creative Commons would let him stream existing TV shows)

Ariong posted:

Did I dream this post?

Boxturret posted:

didn't they also make an artwork that fed itself in to a shredder?

notwithoutmyanus posted:

bank fraud

infernal machines posted:

hungred

Boxturret posted:

you used the fondue QR code

Lead out in cuffs posted:

Oh yeah this isn't news to folks following Musk.

I'm just surprised she was on the board of OpenAI, both because she was Musk's direct subordinate, but also because she secretly had his babies.

Midjack posted:

he wasn't married at the time and had already been dumped by grimes when she became his most recent ivf broodmare.

qirex posted:

he’s going to get shanked when his elaborate preserved fish futures scheme blows up

Deep Dish Fuckfest posted:

cz sanctions city 1,667,153 apparent violations

haveblue posted:

when safemoon says goodbye
casualty of defi
that’s bankruptcy

qirex posted:

we did, three hours ago

qirex posted:

voight-kampf test

Eeyo posted:

the main guy is signing his text messages?

smellmycheese posted:

Has anyone said Butt Cauldron?

Chris Knight posted:

shackleford posted:

fuckin' lmao so craig wright, the guy pretending to be satoshi, just got completely corncobbed in some lawsuit

https://www.opencrypto.org/2024-01-23_Schedule_of_Dr_Wrights_Further_Forgeries-COPAvWright.pdf

...

This file is a LaTeX source file, taken from a folder on Dr Wright’s Overleaf account. Dr Wright
has stated that, as Satoshi Nakamoto, he wrote the Bitcoin White Paper using LaTeX. He has also
stated that this document “uniquely codes for the Bitcoin White Paper”, and that when compiled
in Overleaf, produce a copy of the Bitcoin White Paper “in the same form as” and “materially
identical to” that published by Satoshi Nakamoto. [Wright 6 {E/21/3}; Field 1 at 27 {P3/13/10}]

The Bitcoin White Paper was not written in LaTeX. It was written and produced in OpenOffice
2.4. Its metadata record that it was produced by that means. Examination by both parties’ experts
has led them both to conclude, and agree, that it was produced by that means based on every level
of the pdf from the fine details of its typographical presentation, down to the binary digits of the
PDF. [Rosendahl 1 at 66-68 {G/7/23}] [Rosendahl 1 at 191 {G/7/58}] [Lynch 1 at 117-120 and
122.c-d {I/5/36}] [Rosendahl / Lynch 1 at 2 {Q/5/1}].

Dr Wright’s LaTeX files from the TC folder are not original to 2008 or 2009. Using LaTeX
software that is up to date for 2009, none of them compiles properly, instead producing errors
and warnings. The files L and C could not be compiled at all. In order to compile them at all, it is
necessary to fix the files or use a much more modern version of LaTeX software [Rosendahl 1 at
106-112 {G/7/38}]. This is because Dr Wright’s LaTeX files include software packages and options
which could not have been used in 2009 [Rosendahl 1 at 158 {G/7/50}].

...

The original BDO Image was created from a computer running Windows XP. Windows XP does
not record Transaction Log metadata, which was introduced in later operating system. However,
BDOPC.raw does include Transaction Log data, indicating that it was used with a later version of
Windows. Those Transaction logs contains extensive records editing of BDOPC.raw on 17
September 2023. Further, those Transaction Logs indicate other irregularities, such as files being
backdated to appear as if created after they were last modified and accessed. [Madden 4 at 84, -
85 {G/6/28}] [Lynch 1 at 73-75 {I/5/19}]

Windows NTFS file systems record an identifier, the Security ID or “SID”, connected with the
user that edits the files. Of the user documents present on BDOPC.raw, over 99% (over
165,000 files) were apparently created with the correct Security IDs for the original BDO PC
from which the original image was captured in 2007. By contrast, 71 of Dr Wright’s New
Reliance documents were added later, using a different user account with a different SID (the
“Manipulation User”) [Madden 4 at 93-98 {G/6/30}] [Madden / Lynch 1 at 12 {Q/6/5}].
These include all the documents among the New Reliance Documents which actually support
Dr Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

There are multiple iterations of the drive image stored on the same Samsung Drive. Mr Madden
has recovered two more which were deleted in September 2023, but which he has managed to
recover: InfoDef09.raw and Image.raw. These are identical in content to 99.5% of
BDOPC.raw. The remaining 0.5% is made up of data pertaining to New Reliance Documents, and
previous edits of New Reliance Documents. These drive images are among hundreds of GB of data
deleted from the Samsung Drive in September 2023. [Madden 4 at 13.d-e, {G/6/8}]

...

17.2.When asked for the password. Dr Wright stated that “he was hacked in 2020 and his
password files were lost” [Shoosmiths’ letter of 11 January 2024]. That is implausible.

17.3.When asked for details of the alleged hack, Dr Wright stated that he had actually been hacked
at least 10 times [Shoosmiths’ letter of 15 January 2024]. That is at least 10 times more
implausible.

...

4. These documents have been created with the Pandoc document conversion software. Pandoc is
an open-source piece of software that can convert documents between different formats. It can
generate LaTeX documents automatically [Macfarlane 1 at 3 {C/19/1}]. In particular:

4.1. {ID_004687} contains a line which states that it was created as LaTeX via Pandoc, which is
characteristic of the use of Pandoc. [Macfarlane 1 at 5 {C/19/1}]. Although {ID_004648}
does not include that line “LaTeX via Pandoc”, it includes the other code from the same
October template.

4.2. The template for conversion to LaTeX was not introduced into Pandoc at all until 2010
[Macfarlane 1 at 5 {C/19/1}].

5. The documents have been created during the course of these proceedings:

5.1. Inspection of the (open-source) source code of Pandoc allows for more precise dating. The
document was created after October 2022. The version of Pandoc used for creation of this
document uses code that was not committed to Pandoc until October 2022. [Macfarlane 1 at
9 {C/19/2}].

...

The document has been backdated. It is a Rich Text File created with the editor version
Riched20.dll v10.0.19041. That version of Riched20 is the version associated with the May 2020
update of Windows 10. [Madden 3 at 86-91 {G/5/34}]

...

3. These documents have been backdated. They refer to the use of C++ elements that were not in
existence at their purported date of October 2007. In particular,

3.1 They call on the use of the libraries “<chrono>”, <thread>” and “<random”. These
libraries are part of the C++11 standard, first released in 2011. [Stroustrup 1 at [4]
{C/23/1}]

3.2 <chrono> was not first proposed until 11 June 2008. [Hinnant 1 at 4 {C/18/1}]

3.3 The first discussion of what became <chrono> was not published until 19 January 2008,
and was not at that time called <chrono>. [Hinnant 1 at 5 {C/18/2}]

3.4 Within <chrono>, these documents call for the use of the function “sleep_for”. By 19
January 2008, the function was referred to as ‘sleep’ (not yet ‘sleep_for’). [Hinnant 1 at 5
{C/18/2}]

3.5 By that time, neither <chrono> nor “sleep_for” yet existed, even on the personal
computer of its developer. [Hinnant 1 at 5 {C/18/2}]

...

5.1. A deleted file containing part of the content of {ID_004715} was recovered from
InfoDef09.raw. The file was named “Section7.tex”: [PM46 at 92-99 {H/278/25}]. The
content of the deleted “Section7.tex” begins with the words:

“Certainly, here’s the LaTeX code for Section 7, which covers
Recommendations.
``` latex

5.2. The content of the deleted “Section7.tex” ends with the words:

This section presents a set of recommendations based on the research
findings, targeting both practitioners and academic researchers. The
citations are…

5.3. That content is entirely consistent with and indicative of responses provided by an
unconditioned ChatGPT to the question “Are you able to output some template latex code for
section 7 which relates to recommendations?” including the structure, length of response, the
use of “Certainly”, and the use of syntax “``` latex” to introduce LaTeX code. [PM46 at
92-99 {H/278/25}]

5.4. That content was deleted from the version of the equivalent document disclosed within
BDOPC.raw. {ID_004715} however does include the proposed code generated by ChatGPT
within the body of the document.

5.5. ChatGPT did not exist in 2007.

...

5. Hash Based Shadowing.TIF contains metadata with the following information [PM46 at 126-128
{H/278/44}]:

a. it was created on 12 March 2018;

b. it was created with MS Windows Photo Viewer 10.0.14393.0, software associated with
Windows 10 version 1607, which was released in August 2016; and

c. it was scanned with a Xerox DocuMate 5540 scanner.

6. The Xerox DocuMate 5540 model of scanner was not produced until 18 February 2015 [Sherrell
19 at 12 {P1/19/3}].

...

8.3. References to the font Calibri Light [PM46 at 18 {H/278/6}], a font which had not yet been
designed in 2007.

Dans Macabre posted:

sniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiipe