Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: skooma512)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



how many banks have collapsed so far? is it "just" silicon valley bank and signature bank?

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



ok updated it slightly

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



are any of the curves doing the contango yet?

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



a_gelatinous_cube posted:

Just gotta walk around with a mask of a face strapped to the back of your head 100% of the time so the mountain lion thinks you are watching it and won't attack you like those guys in India did to avoid getting eaten by tigers.
https://i.imgur.com/jfptMVF.mp4

I always wear my Necromonger Lord Marshal cosplay gear when going outside as any sane goon would do. It took some work but I've also integrated the 3M 7800s full face respirator into it to deal with bio threats from humans and deer.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Mr Hootington posted:

My posting hasn't changed
I didn't want to say this but your VIX is in contango

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Everything is normal in fact everything is hypernormal

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



does france have any pipelines?

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Train workers in Stockholm, capital of Sweden are doing a 3 day wild cat strike this week. They object to the railway company reducing staff and replacing train conductors with cameras leaving the drivers alone on the trains responsible for both safety and driving the trains.

The Work posted:

Wild strike stops the commuter trains in Stockholm - train drivers protest against the stoppage of train attendants

The train conductors must return on board the commuter trains, demand the train drivers in Stockholm who went on a wild strike. Many drivers are dissatisfied with their own union SEKO.

"It's drat sad to have to strike. But when nobody listens to us, we have no choice," says Niklas Sjödin, train driver on the commuter trains in Stockholm.

"If it was about money, we wouldn't have been standing here. But it's about safety. We drivers can't keep an eye on what's happening in the train while we're driving," says colleague Sandra Jansson.

from The Work article: https://arbetet.se/2023/04/17/vild-strejk-stoppar-pendeltagen-i-stockholm-lokforare-protesterar-mot-stopp-av-tagvardar/

The Proletarian posted:

The strike is on - great support from the passengers

Around 80 percent of commuter train drivers in Stockholm went on strike on Monday morning. "This strike has broad support," says train driver Nils Westberg Ahlmark.

The locomotive drivers in the commuter traffic in Stockholm have had enough. Both the traffic company MTR and Stockholm's Local Traffic (SL) refuse to listen to rational arguments: they are determined to push through the lone crew on the trains.

Commuter train drivers are just as determined that the train attendants should remain.

"We stand up for the safety of ourselves and our passengers. The train conductors must return to security duty in the driver's cabin", says Nils Westberg Ahlmark, one of the drivers behind the movement "Don't touch my train conductor".

About 80 percent of the approximately 290 active train drivers in the commuter train service have joined the strike, which is to last for three days; from 03.00 on Monday morning until Thursday morning. The strike is a so-called wildcat strike, which is not sanctioned by the union.

"There is a lot of support behind this. Many support each other not only here today, but also in the workplace and on social media. Those who still drive are probationers who don't dare risk their jobs and union representatives who have to drive", says Nils Westberg Ahlmark to The Proletarian.

The travelers are also positive. When the Proletarian meets the strikers outside on Centralplan outside the Central Station on Vasagatan in Stockholm, many come forward and express their support. But there are also those who shake their heads.

In just a little more than a day, the strike fund, administered via the Confederation of Workers' Solidarity, has received just over half a million kroner.

"We have broad support", states Nils Westberg Ahlmark. And it feels like the public has had a pent-up need to voice their opinion about safety as well... so now that we've gone on a wildcat strike, people have hung on.

Since it became clear that the train drivers would go on wild strike, the transport company MTR has come up with threats of varying degrees: damages, dismissal, the labor court. The central Seko Union has distanced itself from the strike.

"We did not expect anything else. They follow their rule book and we who are on strike follow ours. If all those on strike were dismissed... then there would be no traffic at all" notes Nils Westberg Ahlmark.

"There is a certain process in this, and not much will happen".

Mainly three politicians are singled out as being responsible for the strike: they are the ones behind the MTR trying to push through the sole staffing and replace the train attendants with malfunctioning cameras. The decision was made by MTR in collaboration with the right-wing majority in Region Stockholm, previously supported by the Green Party, led by the then traffic regional council Kristoffer Tamsons (M), now vice chairman of SL.

It is also the current traffic regional councilor Anton Fendert from the Green Party who has consistently attended MTR's affairs and opposed the train drivers' and passengers' demands for safety. And that is Jens Sjöström, the Social Democrats' strongman in the region. In the election campaign, Sjöström appeared everywhere and promised to stop the process against the sole staffing of the trains, if Social Democrats gained power in the region. Once there, Sjöström broke his promise.

Now Tamsons, Fendert and Sjöström shine with their absence. None of them have dared to show themselves among the strikers outside Central Station:

"No, none of them have been here", says Nils Westberg Ahlmark. "But if they come down, we would be happy to have a dialogue with them".

The Proletarian article: https://proletaren.se/artikel/strejken-ar-igang-stort-stod-fran-resenarerna

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



There might not be much blood but you too can put L30n T 2021 on ignore now :stoked:

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Sorry Swiftoids, but Taylor Swift is going where she belongs from now on – into the dustbin of history! Taylor СПФС SPFS and Taylor 人民幣跨境支付系統 CIPS is the future!

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



In fact as the dollar loses value they will have to print more of it.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



forkboy84 posted:

Looking forward to more banks failing today, Inshallah

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Thorn Wishes Talon posted:

isn't charlie munger the dude who designed that "ideal" student dorm for a california college that looked weirdly like a prison complex?
Yes. No windows. Windows are for closers only.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



No need to panic. The US banking system is strong and safe.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC





Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



I guess it's time to learn Chinese & Russian to get the good search results

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Comrade Kramer will fulfill Comrade Trotsky's Destiny.

In the near future of DOW 40K there is only Total Class War.

:toxx:

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Thorn Wishes Talon posted:

it's funny you refer to "both sides" as lunatics, but let's be real: there's nothing biden could have done to make disgruntled pretend-leftists like you happy, so who tf cares what you think, other than your posting pals? the answer is nobody
I hosed Biden first you're too late, pal

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



PoundSand posted:

something that confuses me about shrinkflation is the material (food) cost tends to be one of the cheaper parts of a lot of production lines. Like if you use the same packages and put in 10% less food, you’re not saving anywhere near 10% on what you end up distributing. with some stuff like soda packs getting smaller or whatever sure you could look at less cans as more or less a flat reduction in costs but for bulk packaged goods they’re only saving fractions of what they’re stealing from the consumer.

On an individual company scale that may still seem worth it but you know what would make your brands food really stand out and pop off the shelf right now? Having the normal sizes and making a point of advertising that. This feels like one area where capitalism should actually function okay from competition so why is no one competing? If nothing else store brands could probably make a killing right now by pushing this aspect.
Why compete if the corporations all have the same owners.

Jon Pod Van Damm has issued a correction as of 15:25 on May 28, 2023

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



The American Imperialist state can not be reformed. It must become small enough to drown in a bathtub.
—Comrade Naurqvizt, probably

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



FlapYoJacks posted:

Metroid Dread iirc.
https://twitter.com/devtesla/status/1446653995808866306

As a PC gamer I can emphasize with his predicament.

Jon Pod Van Damm has issued a correction as of 09:34 on Jun 20, 2023

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Absence Makes The Heart Grow Fonder
Why Americans need several 2-week and 4-week paid vacations every year to get the time to miss their coworkers. The only way to get people back into the office is to first let them out of the office.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Glumwheels posted:

Oh no you got me, the dude he owes a poo poo ton of money in unpaid taxes and child support and switched from the “people’s party” to the Green Party is totally on the up and up.
I was all in on Biden in 2020. Biden has done some good things that these C-SPAM leftists are unwilling to acknowledge. I'm keeping an open mind but I don't see how Biden can win against Trump. I'm sorry, but I have to say that Cornell West is the more realistic option. Can we afford running another weak candidate like in 2016? Trump and MAGA are an existential threat to our democracy. I want someone that can defeat Trump. West is that candidate.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Vox Nihili posted:

Jesus Christ man

Even the libs had to hold their nose
He was running against Trump. I would have preferred Bernie or Warren but they lost the primary. Biden was a better choice than Trump. And now West is a better choice than Biden to defeat Trump.

Jon Pod Van Damm has issued a correction as of 06:04 on Sep 19, 2023

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Bar Ran Dun posted:

at what point does one become a fascist?

we have posters like Crowsbeak where it’s like yeah you are a nationalist socialist Christian dominionist who wants to put folks in camps and brand them you are clearly a fascist.

But where’s the line? I mean authoritarianism isn’t enough. there’s a case for Stalinism and Maoism and more recently Xi thought.

but I don’t get the unironic Trump stuff. I mean Stephen the loving nazi Miller was a huge influence on immigration during his admin, which somehow you all a giving glumwheels poo poo for observing. it’s detached from reality.
1. Reject as propaganda any account of Soviet history during the Stalin period that by its rhetoric moralizing loaded language, vituperation, etc. shows that the author is not objective.


2. Reject as propaganda all accounts that refer to the Soviet Union as totalitarian, that use the terms Stalinist or Stalinism, that call Stalin a dictator, that claim the Soviet Union was ruled by terror or he used the term Great Terror instead of Yezhovshchina or bad time of Yezhov, that refer to the Gulag as death camps or the prisoners of slaves, that claim that Capitalist and imperialist states are democracies. Reject them.


3. Reject as propaganda any work that in any way attempts to compare the Stalin-era Soviet Union to Hitlerite Germany or Stalin to Hitler.


4. Reject as propaganda any writing that affirms the halatomor, that the Moscow trials were frame-ups, that Stalin had people shot, that collectivization was not necessary, that industrialization was brutal or didn't work.


5. Avoid all Trotskyist accounts about the Soviet Union including about Lenin, Stalin, Socialism in one country, or about Trotsky himself. No Trotskyist has questioned the cult of personality around Trotsky himself. No Trotskyists strive for objectivity. All Trotskyists fall afoul of confirmation bias.


6. Avoid specifically the site M*rxis dot org unless there is some text on that site that cannot be gotten in digital format anywhere else.


7. Reject any so-called Marxist theory that is not based on practice. That means that all theory that assumes the Khrushchev and post-Khrushchev lies about Soviet history of the Stalin period is false and has nothing to offer. Sure there may be a needle of truth in the haystack of empty verbiage but it'll take too much time to find it if it's there at all. Only theory based on an accurate understanding of the history of the Soviet Union during the Stalin years can possibly have anything beneficial to offer those of us who want to learn from the successes, and the failures of the Soviet union in order to do better next time.


8. Remember why all these anti-Communist anti-Stalin lies and propaganda exist in the first place. They exist because of the magnificent achievements of the Stalin years of the Soviet union. To name just a few

  • Collectivization of agriculture ending the thousand-plus year cycle of devastating famines.


  • Industrialization accomplishing in little more than a decade, and entirely without foreign investment relying solely on the Soviet working class and peasantry.


  • The defeat of the Nazi hordes and their allies.


  • The worldwide spread of the Communist movement through the Comintern.


  • The fight against racism. The fight against racism was pioneered in the Soviet Union.


  • The fight against discrimination against women. This is where International Women's Day was a holiday and the only place it was a holiday until in the 1960s.


Provision to all workers of:

  • Inexpensive housing

  • Inexpensive public transportation

  • Free education

  • Free higher education

  • Annual vacations

  • Universal medical care

  • Retirement and old age pensions

These are the some of the magnificent results of the Stalin era in the Soviet Union. That's why it's attacked.


  • The successful fight against the imperialism of the so-called democracies, democratic Capitalist countries

  • The big boost to unionization of workers in industrial countries

  • Forcing the Capitalist states to provide some degree of social welfare benefits for working people in order to blunt the attraction of the Communist movement


These are just a few of the reasons why pro-Capitalist and phony leftist pseudo-scholars falsify, distort, and just plain lie about Soviet history of the Stalin period.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Chamale posted:

:hai:

This looks like it's copy-pasted from somewhere; where's it originally from?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0dgp7J5DcU

Boomers ftw

Jon Pod Van Damm has issued a correction as of 06:49 on Sep 25, 2023

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



net work error posted:

Just an honest days work

:cheersbird:

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



shrike82 posted:

https://twitter.com/unusual_whales/status/1708873977408471402?s=20
Florida has overtaken New York to become the second most-valuable US housing market, per Zillow.
quoting for posterity

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnX-D4kkPOQ

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



one of the best valve employees

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



skooma512 posted:

Not everyday lol. I read a couple articles about monopolies and subscribed to the free feed and the emails show up every couple weeks.

Is there some terrible secret about him? I don't really look into article writers.
he's a china hawk

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Tesla threatens to bring in strikebreakers as Swedish workers strike

quote:

Members of Sweden's IF Metall metalworkers' union working at Tesla service centres went on strike on Friday morning following a breakdown in negotiations over a collective bargaining agreement.

Around 90 percent of employees in Sweden are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and the metal workers' union, IF Metall, has long tried to negotiate one with Tesla without success.

The union wants Tesla to sign an agreement offering the same working conditions to Tesla's mechanics as those offered to mechanics at other companies.

The company is refusing to sign one, IF Metall has reported, saying that company claims that it doesn't sign collective bargaining agreements anywhere in the world.

Tesla's Nordic lead, Kim Jensen, said in an internal meeting that the company is considering employing strikebreakers, Dagens Arbete has reported.

"If they bring in strikebreakers then that's completely unique," IF Metall's bargaining agreement secretary, Veli-Pekka Säikkälä, told the newspaper. "That would be crossing all boundaries. That kind of thing happened in Sweden in the 1920s and 30s."

"If they start employing strikebreakers and actively try to break the strike, then they have mobilised the entire union movement against them. Not just the Swedish Trade Union Confederation, but all of them. Then the issue at hand becomes less important."

Tesla Sweden's head of communications, Maria Lantz, did not wish to comment when approached by the TT newswire.

Not all of the employees working at the affected service centres are IF Metall members and the union did not disclose how many of the workers were members, saying only that it was "a lot", and that more had joined in recent days.

If the union succeeds with its blockade, it could become more difficult for Tesla owners to get their cars serviced or repaired, despite the fact that some other workshops also service Tesla cars.

However, things could get worse if the union extends its strike.

IF Metall has given notice of its intention to extend the strike from November 3rd to apply to 20 further workshops, which would also put members there under a blockade, preventing them from carrying out any work on Tesla cars at all. This could also prevent owners of new cars from collecting them, as members would be barred from carrying out the work needed in order to register new cars.

There are no plans for new negotiations between the two parties.

"As recently as Tuesday, when we had our last meeting with Tesla, they made it clear that they have no intentions of signing a collective bargaining agreement with us," IF Metall's spokesperson, Jesper Pettersson, said. 

When asked how long strike measures were going to continue, he replied they would be in place "until we have a collective bargaining agreement in place".
Musk should show these spoiled finns who the boss is

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



the Transport union warns that they will not unload any Tesla vehicles in any Swedish harbour

there's also a potential upcoming strike at finn-tech :dadjoke: company Klarna

quote:

Swedish unions threaten to strike at payment company Klarna

Two Swedish trade unions handed a strike warning to tech giant Klarna on Thursday afternoon.

"We've waited long enough," local union chairman Sen Kanner said. "Unionen's members at Klarna want an agreement in place."

The two unions walked out of negotiations with Klarna on Thursday after a couple of years of trying to come to an agreement. They're asking for a collective bargaining agreement with the same working conditions as those offered at similar workplaces.

From November 7th, members of Unionen and Engineers of Sweden will strike at Klarna's head office in Stockholm, where around 2,000 employees work, according to the unions.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Swedish unions expand solidarity blockades and strikes against Tesla in Sweden. The initial conflict covers 120 mechanics who are members of the IF Metall union.

quote:

The SEKO (The Swedish Union for Service and Communications Employees) Union stops letters and packages to Tesla

SEKO's board decided today to give notice of solidarity measures in support of IF Metall's (Swedish Industrial Union and the Swedish Metalworkers' Union) conflict with the global car manufacturer, Tesla. The reason for the conflict is that Tesla and their owner Elon Musk refuse to sign collective agreements and follow the rules of the Swedish labor market.

"IF Metall's fight is also our fight. By refusing to adhere to the rules of the labour market here in Sweden, Tesla is trying to gain a competitive advantage by giving workers worse wages and conditions than they would have had with a collective agreement. This is of course completely unacceptable. The fight that IF Metall is now taking is important for the entire Swedish collective agreement model. Therefore, our union board has chosen to issue a solidarity notice," says SEKO's union chairman, Gabriella Lavecchia."

The dockworkers union will also expand their blockade from 4 ports to all ports next week.

Jon Pod Van Damm has issued a correction as of 18:33 on Nov 8, 2023

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



There's nothing wrong with roe cod sandwich :airquote: caviar :airquote: paste.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Frosted Flake posted:

Have any of the new generation of kitchen gadgets lowered the value of luxury foods?

Instant pots and air fryers aren't about letting every dinner party host serve the same food as the Savoy, I feel like they haven't had the same impact as the appliances of the 1950's did. KitchenAid stand mixers are still a prestige item, and I don't think it's a coincidence they have reintroduced the 1950's colours.
Sous vide or long time low temperature cooking lets plebs make some dishes with consistent results.

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



Tesla Sweden union strike update:

quote:

Now the Swedish Building Workers' Union is also getting involved in the conflict with Tesla. From 28 November, members of companies bound by collective agreements with the Swedish Building Workers' Union will refuse to carry out both new construction and service and repair work at Tesla's workshops around Sweden.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jon Pod Van Damm
Apr 6, 2009

THE POSSESSION OF WEALTH IS IN AND OF ITSELF A SIGN OF POOR VIRTUE. AS SUCH:
1 NEVER TRUST ANY RICH PERSON.
2 NEVER HIRE ANY RICH PERSON.
BY RULE 1, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO PRESUME THAT ALL DEGREES AND CREDENTIALS HELD BY A WEALTHY PERSON ARE FRAUDULENT. THIS JUSTIFIES RULE 2--RULE 1 NEEDS NO JUSTIFIC



The leader of the democratic world met with the American oligarchs' top henchmen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA99rfoS3UM

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply