Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Mendrian posted:

So I realize the narrative here is that Democrats are making up ballots and dropping them off at counting offices around the country.

Due to the Republican Rule of Projection should I assume this means that this is how they 'won' those elections in the first place?

Every time I actually hear about election fraud it turns out to be a Republican who voted for their dead parent or voted twice or something to "make it even".

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Fulchrum posted:

This is why I'm not 100% certain the US government hasn't covered up alien contact, since if they had, and Trump had access to that information, he would ignore it cause the aliens didn't have huge tits or talk about him enough.

Also the deep state wouldn't let Trump know about the aliens.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Not a Step posted:

Didnt Trump have an active lawsuit against his scam university during the primary? Being a sex pest and scam artist is no barrier to running in TYOOL 2018, and at the very least makes the inevitable book deal that much spicier. You could say that excusing sex pests is a Republican thing and good Democrats won't stand for it, but, uh, Hillary actively defended her sex pest husband and slammed his accusers repeatedly and people were and are #StillWithHer

E: This is in no way to condone Basta being, in all likelihood, an abusive poo poo.

Excellent false equivalency there.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Kale posted:

Here career long judge that's literally the Chief Justice of The Supreme Court, let me educate you on the career and ethics of a position you've held for nearly 15 years now with the thoughts I just spent the last 15 minutes on. This guy seriously has some loving balls, stupid ones but it's apparent.

I'm not sure it's really balls. He's just too stupid to know his place, and his inheritance protects him from the consequences of his own stupidity.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Yes strong daddy will care about you because strong daddy obviously cares about things that are not him.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

GreyjoyBastard posted:

yo, you're increasingly talking yourself around to "people who disagree with me are dangerous counterrevolutionaries"

and that's without getting into your cspam-thread / ongoing descriptive project additions of reasons and classifications for why people who disagree with you are fundamentally and irreparably bad

while i understand becoming radicalized in the Age of Trump, you maaaay wish to reexamine the assessments you're reaching

You could only possibly be saying this because of your privilege. You are the problem.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Ate My Balls Redux posted:

The only other thing I could find is some people were mad about something he said about gender on his Netflix show? Either way, not something I'd lump in with sexual harassment

He makes some fairly insane claims about gender and sexuality on his netflix show and tries to pass it off as science. Mostly that's the issue with him, he's not a scientist, and gender identity/sexuality is complicated and emerging at best, it's certainly not "settled science".

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Rigel posted:

North Carolina was supposed to certify their elections this week. The 9-member NC board of elections voted 7-2 to not certify NC-09 and to hold a hearing on December 21st to examine complaints of election fraud.

Talk about projection, after all this whining about election fraud and Trump's constant bullshit, its the GOP that is caught up in a legit case where actual evidence of election fraud exists.

edit: the board is made up of 5 democrats and 4 republicans. The 4 republicans split 2-2 on the vote to certify.

This is always the case with election fraud. They actually find some, it's always Republicans doing it - and I don't mean the use of laws and administrative power to disenfranchise, which is it's own issue, but every story about some guy who voted twice turns out to be a Republican.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Waroduce posted:

This legitimately is a side benefit of China chemical manufacturing sectors. Not to be as humorous or flippant as the above poster, but getting Americans addicted to and or killing them is a net positive for China from a zero sum international relations perspective. Both the United States and China are seen to be in competition to be the world's leading economy (regardless of the GDP difference) and if China can kill off enough Americans it can have wide ranging effects. I'm not super read into this but I have heard discussed that the resources being allocated to fight the opioid crisis could be better spent elsewhere. Scientific/pharmaceutical efforts and research are being wasted to provide answers , law enforcement and DEA have to do address it instead of dealing with other issues, tax dollars go to social programs to answer the drug epidemic instead of other social safety nets, not to mention the human cost of dead Americans. Each of those dead people have lost potential and could have done ~something~ with their lives. The sort of grandiose claim anti abortionists like to make about killing the baby that cures cancer sort of applies.

This is kind of an insane clash of civilizations way of viewing the world. I doubt China is out there chortling and rubbing their hands together over the opioid crisis.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

It's kind of amazing what a loving child he is. Like he is such a monumental fuckup, probably the grandest Chauncy Gardiner of all time yet he can't face the smallest criticism or he hides.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

"President didn't gently caress up - for an entire week!"

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Hieronymous Alloy posted:

If, like Cruz, your face has all the definition and shape of a sack of rotting egg milk, even a lame beard is a way to give some definition that isn't otherwise there, like painting a face on the aforesaid sack of rotting eggmilk.

What is egg milk? Or eggmilk.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Chimp_On_Stilts posted:

The GOP is pretty good at enacting policies which create the things they hate:
- Abstinence Only sex ed which produces pregnant teens and abortions
- Middle east policy which brutalizes people to the point where they become terrorists
- Climate policy which will displace hundreds of millions of people, making them refugees and migrants
- Economic policy which is pushing Millennials-and-younger to embrace socialist policies

Isn't that the point of the whole Republican schtick, to create the problems which only they can solve because their voters are too stupid to think?

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

TulliusCicero posted:

Except it is starting to backfire hard, so rather than tone it down, they will now punish you for voting incorrectly

All Ponzi schemes fail eventually. The problem is this one will take huge portions of the world with it.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

friendbot2000 posted:

This. We dont want a decorum hound. Bring out the loving knives and carve out that pound of flesh.

It's not about decorum, it's about doing what's right. Trump should be investigated because he committed crimes, not because someone trolled someone on twitter. Investigating someone for pissing them off is what Republicans do.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

JasonV posted:

I thought the point of adding tarifs to foreign steel is so that American steel is cheaper and so demand for it goes up, which means they need to produce more and hire more people. Instead American steel companies just raised their prices to match the foreign steel prices. Because there's no new demand, they can just pocket the extra profits. The only people losing out are American businesses that use steel.

No, tariffs don't work to do anything other than raise the prices of domestic whatever. There's some argument to be made for "infant industries" but with something mature like steel, this is what you get.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Groovelord Neato posted:

dershowitz had an unearned sterling reputation before he started stanning for trump and i have absolutely no idea why the gently caress he'd torpedo his legacy for seemingly no gain.

Guliani is kind of the same way. He had a reputation (i wouldn't say sterling) but for some reason has gone full chud for Trump. I think it's something about the presidency. Even if a full-on differently abled person like Trump occupies the office now, it has had Washington and Adams and Lincoln and JFK in the past.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Mercury Ballistic posted:

If Trump was planning on Trump TV, why was Fox news so happy to support him? Would he not be direct competition had that been the plan?

What are they gonna do not support the Republican nominee?

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Gatts posted:

Would this be a good thing or a bad thing? Whenever I hear about dumping social security in the stock market all I can think of is exploiting people's guaranteed income for privileged few to steal and get richer at others expense and once it collapses people are left holding the bag.

But Social Security owning means of production...what does that extrapolate to?

The problem with this scenario is that the people "representing" those interests would be the worst kind of patrician hacks who would not protect workers rights at all, they would be part of the revolving door problem between industry and government.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

LeeMajors posted:

Does anyone except the right think of the Clinton impeachment every day? It was almost twenty loving years ago.

It's blatant propaganda to discredit the investigation of a corrupt administration as a tit for tat partisan response to a corrupt investigation of another administration.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.
Wow the groupthink in this thread is hilarious.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Fritz Coldcockin posted:

Why is it that the only people with takes like this are lovely people? News flash, homey: AOC is objectively awesome. It's not "groupthink" to call it like it is.

I personally like AOC, but I don't think people need to jump down someone's throat because they aren't that impressed at this point.

But yes, I'm the lovely person for wanting a civil debate without insulting someone for disagreeing with you.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Wylie posted:

Where did we all get the idea that Clinton's impeachment was revenge for Nixon? I don't recall that being A Thing™ at all at the time. Nixon's legacy as a crime-doer who deserved at least what he got (if not more) was set long before Clinton's time.

Given that it was an obviously totally politically motivated ludicrous investigation, it may well have been revenge from the right. But I don't remember that being bandied about the airwaves.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Party Plane Jones posted:

note that this article is from today

I'm not sure I can handle another election in Florida that keeps going on and on and on. That being said if that judge decides to let the ballots be counted and they change one of the outcomes the tears from the right will be of a magnificent vintage.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

ZypherIM posted:

Not knowing what you were linking, I was really expecting some ALways Sunny video to be honest.


That transcript about Flynn is just great. Its the FBI, not your "good ol' boys club".

As far as they are concerned the FBI does exist to keep the browns and other inferiors down. If Trump has his way that's what it will become in fact.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Charlz Guybon posted:

I do like that the Post invented a new pinocchio level just for Trump though.

I don't. He's a liar. They should just say "he's lying". All this doublespeak to get around the fact he blatantly lies all the loving time is the media being complicit in those lies.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

MasterSlowPoke posted:

Who even wants them gone? Like who is their presence affecting, besides their own families?

None of these policies are based on reason. The cruelty and racism is the point.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Krispy Wafer posted:

Physically Trump is to Newt as Obama is to Trump.

Newt is a slug. I really don’t see him doing any kind of high stress job without cracking relatively quickly. He hasn’t been in the weeds since 98.

He might be just the Trump version of a CoS, not really doing the job, hanging out, being Trumps buddy.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Pluskut Tukker posted:

Maybe she thinks Trump will pay more attention to her if she looks more like him?

She's probably right TBQH. Though why you would want attention from Jabba I'm not sure.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Squalid posted:

I'm not sure I even understand what you mean by benefit of the doubt here. When I see posts like this I'm reminded of this article, about how Trump supporters fall for fake news.

I often ask myself: do I believe something because I have seen a substantial body of evidence that supports and points towards an idea, or do I believe it because it feels true. the woman in the article believes the story about Michele Obama giving Trump the finger because she feels Mrs. Obama disrespects Trump and the country. The fact of the disrespect is the important thing anyway, why worry about the specific details? Trump is fundamentally corrupt and that's the important thing to get right anyway, so of course this specific $25 million that was misused in this specific way, and if it wasn't, well the essence of corruption was the real issue anyway so why worry about the specific details?

Well I think that's the wrong way to make sense of the world. I prefer to feel nothing at all about that which can be empirically verified, at least when trying to determine if it is true or not. Personally I prefer to believe as little as possible. Regarding Trump's inaugural funds, there's so many ways fraud could have been committed, or funds could have been legally abused, it's just silly to make any assumptions about specific facts without a lot more evidence than is now available.

I don't think anyone is dropping confetti in the air in the thread or anything. But given Trump's record of corruption and crime, and doing things like using charities to pay off debts etc.. This fits into a pattern of behavior and is kind of hilarious. Trump is also so bad at crimes that it's not beyond belief he was like I need 25M, bill this thing for 25M. Conservatives largely are indoctrinated with beliefs than look for data to support those beliefs, with liberals it tends to be more or less the opposite.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

The weirdest thing to me about Q anon is it seems like most of what they accuse Democrats of doing... Trump is actually doing. Friends with a pedophile ring organizer, traitor, incompetent etc.. The amount of projection is just kind of mind blowing.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

PC LOAD LETTER posted:

So is that new investigation on the Clintons the Repubs cooked up going to come to anything? They do seem to be finding some pretty shady looking poo poo but I don't know how actually illegal it was or if they're just actually grossly misrepresenting things to make a sham "trial" look like the real deal.

The Q nuts and a bunch of the usual RWM seem to be going nuts over it and while I hope the Clintons get busted if they really did some super bad stuff I'd be just fine with some schadenfruede if it turns into a whole nothing burger that blows over with the new Congress.

Republicans have spent decades and hundreds of millions of dollars investigating the Clintons, and the worst they have come up with is Bill lied about getting a blowjob.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

The best people.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

friendbot2000 posted:

This is amazing and I wish Americans would do something similar on the regular. We need to restore the Sword of Damocles above the heads of the powerful in this country, especially corporations.

The cops would shoot you. And get away with it.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

bilperkins2 posted:

Yeah what would happen if his lawyers argued that he has whatever the medical term for brain worms is? Case thrown out and then nothing, since no Republican would hold him accountable?

If Trump made a legal argument he wasn't competent to stand trial, I think people would have to take a hard look at the 25th amendment.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Ague Proof posted:

"I get very saddened when I have to write letters or call parents or wives or husbands of soldiers who have been killed fighting for our country. It's a great honor. We cherish them. But it's heartbreaking."

He's so weird.

It's about him. "I get very saddened etc.."

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

sexpig by night posted:

But like we saw with North Korea, his dumb brain actually making him buck foriegn policy blob orthodoxy and talk to The Savage Orientals as if they're a valid nation was actually a good move, the whole 'hermit kingdom' doctrine was stupid and yea we probably should be in talks with BOTH Koreas. I don't think Trump is smart enough for that poo poo, but the reaction from the dems to go "OH MY GOD YOU HAVE BETRAYED YOUR NATION SIR" in response was insane and I'm sure we're gonna see that again over our foreverwars too.

How is handing a propaganda victory and legitimizing the Kim regime in return for nothing a "good move"?

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Gort posted:

I was actually terrified when he got elected that there were two Trumps - the racist moron you see on TV, and the slick political operator with the smarts to achieve his horrific agenda, waiting in the wings. Luckily there's only the racist moron, but that's bad enough.

I don't think you could fake Trump. Obviously, if you could it's a nightmare scenario, but I think to appeal to the racist morons you have to be a racist moron.

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Groovelord Neato posted:

tax cuts never work!

That's not true. Tax cuts on the poor and middle-class work, because they simply up their consumption. Tax cuts on the rich don't work because they simply buy more stocks.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

pseudanonymous
Aug 30, 2008

When you make the second entry and the debits and credits balance, and you blow them to hell.

Kale posted:

Didn't this guy campaign on single handedly making it okay to say and celebrate Merry Christmas too? Like can't even do so much as pretend to care about that much in actual practice anymore? Tell little kid Santa doesn't exist to own the libs? I really don't get some of his recent actions where there's no political upside. Just be a garbage human being that flouts all social norms because
???? :confused:

Because he is a garbage human being. Trump is not bright. He doesn't do things for "reasons" that make sense.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply