|
Euphoriaphone posted:i've seen this pic a few times, but this time i made myself contemplate it for a few minutes. how are these real books that exists? they're each like, 250 pages. how do you write 500 pages of fiction about real people? when you're plotting out the book and you have to develop characters for obama and biden, how do you reconcile your characters with their living, breathing actions you see on tv every day? how can you write so many pages while furiously jacking yourself off the entire time? Inside the world of real person fanfiction Contributed by Kayleigh Donaldson @Ceilidhann Jun 4, 2018, 6:02 PM EDT https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/inside-the-world-of-real-person-fanfiction quote:Shipping is as much a part of any fandom as fanart, roleplaying and cosplay. There will always be couples to root for, romances to support, and sexytimes to be imagined in great detail. What makes fandom so striking is its ability to use familiar tropes in unique and creative ways to explore the vast parameters of pop culture. What may seem as simple as wanting two characters from a TV show to get together can actually encompass endless ideas about culture, society, our own desires and the vast landscape of entertainment. We ship because we want, and because we know that deep down, there are few things as satisfying as a happily ever after. Wikipedia posted:FanFiction.net also hosts one of the longest works of fiction ever written. The Subspace Emissary's Worlds Conquest, a Super Smash Bros. fanfiction written by FanFiction.net user AuraChannelerChris, gained media attention for its length of over four million words at the time of notice, more than three times as long as In Search of Lost Time written by Marcel Proust, and is still being written. The longest fanfiction on the site is The Loud House: Revamped, a crossover fanfiction of The Loud House which is over 9,500,000 words long as of May 2021.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2021 21:49 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 20:19 |
|
Excelzior posted:if we're going to have neofeudalism I wish we had like neon lances and robosteeds at least
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2021 18:27 |
|
Pepperoneedy posted:First Lady Dr. Jill Biden, FTFY
|
# ¿ Jun 29, 2021 19:21 |
|
Cpt_Obvious posted:The eugenics thread. Wow. It's like a poster took the "super playboy" plotline from DNA^2 seriously
|
# ¿ Jul 9, 2021 18:28 |
|
Anyone said "Ed Buck Breaking" yet?
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2021 15:54 |
|
Excelzior posted:Democrats would rather sacrifice every single one of their professed virtues for the HOPE of a single Republican vote than make any concession to the left Adults compromise, but not with children. Which is why we need the serious and earnest Right to compromise with us, despite their childish protestations, but can ignore the left, who are mere children pretending at being serious and earnest That we are the adults in the room is never questioned
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2021 16:54 |
|
In other news, Buffalo was set to elect India Walton as its first openly socialist mayor, taking over after the stupidity and egotism of Byron Brown dug the city into a quagmire of poo poo over the past 16 years. Brown believed he was invincible, which led to a stunning defeat in the Democratic primary. He then tried to run on the Republican ticket, but the Republicans didn't even bother to register for the mayoral election. Brown vowed to fight on with a write-in campaign, helped by none other than professional "angry guy in an F-150" Carl Paladino. This is poised to go about as well as you'd expect, since most of Brown's supporters and small business tyrants live in the subrubs to get away from the black people. So, to push back this socialist scourge, the Buffalo common council has decided on a new tactic: getting rid of the post of mayor entirely. https://www.wivb.com/news/could-buffalo-become-a-city-without-a-mayor/ quote:Could Buffalo become a city without a mayor? Brown doesn't like this, because he's convinced he's going to win. Somehow. Meanwhile, the Buffalo News is attacking India Walton with every scrap of anything they can locate, including the fact that her neighbors said her roommate was dealing drugs because people regularly came over, and we get some deep dives "just asking questions" about why a poor person had someone with a drug conviction living with them, and also her kids were too loud. https://buffalonews.com/news/local/...db8830377b.html quote:Buffalo police investigated a complaint in 2018 that a man was suspected of dealing drugs from the Fruit Belt house of Democratic mayoral nominee India B. Walton, according to police reports and Walton's former landlord. The Democrats. Not even once.
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2021 17:10 |
|
eviltastic posted:I've always been partial to Larry Gonick's guess of "Yahu-wahu". According to noted Talmudic scholar Dave Sim, it's "Yooh-Whoo"
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2021 19:54 |
|
Some Guy TT posted:https://mobile.twitter.com/StevenOverly/status/1427683466808897537 I like that we're normalizing adoption and homosexual relationships at a previously unseen, traditionally conservative level of power. I thought it was very nice when a gay teenager said in an interview that he liked Buttigieg because finally there was someone like him in the government. I'm sure it's the same way of people in the black community felt about Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell. But, much like Rice and Powell, I hate that it's this loving guy, and that a lot of the time the conversation goes: "Oh, so you hate him because he's gay?" "No, I hate him because he's a CIA technocrat who helped engineer the looting of Afghanistan." "So what you're saying is, you're homophobic." loquacius posted:https://twitter.com/taylorswiftly93/status/1428965246874521602?t=Vwr02utNqAvmq_aSWDLmxg&s=19 Didn't Lauren Chen do a big interview with Richard Spenser, and then try to claim he wasn't a racist? Edit: Yup.
|
# ¿ Aug 21, 2021 15:56 |
|
PoontifexMacksimus posted:Hm, sucks. To my mind the only really fruitful way to interface with Lovecraft poo poo is to start by making the racist subtext text and see what that can tell you about its place in the greater culture. It's been done well elsewhere; I guess they didn't succeed in making it cohesive and meaningful? Rather than engage with it in any meaningful or complex way, it was just kinda there. The climax is our heroes using a binding spell which prevents all white people from ever using magic again. Which... Okay? The closest comparison I can think of (and this is an analogy for which I apologize) is when Chris-chan used the Soul Calibre character maker to create in game versions of people she didn't like and then would record youtube videos of her beating them up. I mean, if it makes you feel better, cool, but it's not going to do much more than help folks blow off steam.
|
# ¿ Sep 21, 2021 21:07 |
|
docbeard posted:I kind of want to hear the tortured logic that casts a term that white people used to describe other white people as racist. *Hotepishly* "Rhett Butler was a black man!" quote:https://www.etymonline.com/word/carpetbagger
|
# ¿ Sep 21, 2021 21:17 |
|
Out here in the land of weird analogies, I got to thinking about the children's comedy film Angels in the Outfield, the 1994 remake of the old Paul Douglas/Janet Leigh vehicle from 1951. The remake stars Danny Glover, Tony Danza and Christopher Lloyd, and features such future stars as Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Adrien Brody, Matthew McConaughey, and Neal McDonough. In this film, Gordon-Levitt is an abused child being abandoned by his motorcycle punk father. The father, played by Dermot Mulroney, wants to go ride his motorcycle around Oregon and Washington for a while, and so gives his 12 year old son up for adoption. Gordon-Levitt, naively, believes that his father is coming back, and asks when they can be a family again. In classic abusive fashion, setting up an ideal goal which can be worked towards but never achieved and thereby transfer fault on the victim for not achieving it, "I'd say when the Angels win the pennant," his father replies sarcastically, before putting on his sunglasses and speeding off on his motorcycle. That evening, Gordon-Levitt prays to God to make the Angels (the baseball team) win the World Series, so he and his dad can be reunited. Hijinks insure when Gordon-Levitt and his friend Milton Davis Jr. go to a baseball game and see angels (the supernatural entities). They convince team manager Danny Glover that the angels (supernatural) are real. Christopher Lloyd and his troop of angels (supernatural) help Tony Danza play baseball better, and the Angels (the baseball team) win the world series. But, it turns out, Dermot Mulroney doesn't care. He still wants to ride his motorcycle, not be a dad. Because this is a kid's movie, Gordon-Levitt is adopted by Danny Glover, and they live happily ever after. The Democrats remind me a lot of Joseph Gordon-Levitt in this film: he doesn't get that his dad will never love him, no matter what he does, and, rather than accept this fact, he moves heaven and earth to try and fulfill what he thinks his dad wants. But, again, his dad wants to ride motorcycles and forget about his dead wife and maybe get drunk and bang the kind of guys and/or girls who hang out at motorcycle bars. The dad in this analogy is conservative voters in the suburbs. Or maybe Joseph Gordon-Levitt is democratic voters, and the dad is democratic politicians. It's something along those lines.
|
# ¿ Sep 22, 2021 18:40 |
|
Some Guy TT posted:i read an interesting book review once that argued the dichotomy of king jr vs malcolm x is very misleading because they influenced each other and by the time of their deaths king jr was noticeably more militant while malcolm x was noticeably more conciliatory Look, what you've got to understand is that King is like Professor X, and Malcom X was like Magneto... In a long running series of pornographic videos made for the internet, a man claims to be a pornographic film producer, and he interviews various young women looking to become pornographic actresses and he also films himself having sex with them. But, the twist is, he's not really a pornographic film producer, and the tapes he is making of himself having sex with the young women will not lead to them being hired in the pornography industry. Thus, it becomes a sort of "meta-pornography" wherein the pornography being made is not the pornography which the actress thinks is being made. We, the viewers, are to enjoy the potential actress's naiveté and inexperience, and identify with the viewpoint of the powerful man who manipulates women effortlessly, using them in a fashion to which they will have no redress. The man is friendly and charismatic, but also a manipulative villain; a very popular power fantasy! This is the sofa upon which he films the pornography. The second twist is that the women are, in fact, pornographic actresses, and the entire interaction is staged! In a similar fashion to the client who manages to film himself having sex with each real estate agent he meets, or the gentlemen driving around in a van who just happen to pick up numerous hitchhikers who are willing to have sex in exchange for money, these pornographic actresses are hired to play the role of a young woman just entering the pornography industry being duped by the machinations of the director.
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2021 15:30 |
|
ram dass in hell posted:BlueAnon "And you know what else is helping pedophiles, Liz? Bluechew.com. Chewable tablets, NOT pills, containing the same active ingredients as Cialis and Viagra, perfect for your trip to Little St. James, or to the back alley of your local Wendy's."
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2021 17:19 |
|
Organ Fiend posted:They're trying to convince themselves. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpAMbpQ8J7g
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2021 19:11 |
|
"You can't yell at me, I'm crying"
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2021 19:48 |
|
empty whippet box posted:what is the point of switching from no to present? Appearances. When she is up for reelection, she can say that she isn't anti-Semetic and didn't vote against the defense of Israel. She is likely under the impression that the people who hate her will be swayed by this technicality and the NYT rating the statement "AOC voted against stopping the vile baby eating Palestinians from accessing Israeli hospitals" four Pinocchios.
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2021 21:56 |
|
Yinlock posted:of course in reality, the pro-genocide side sees her as an anti-semite and the anti-genocide sees her as spineless and amoral Exactly. It is literally the worst possible move in this scenario.
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2021 22:11 |
|
Sedisp posted:If we were to accept Haitians into this country that could increase the level of child poverty in this country. Shame on you Cspam "Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids"
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2021 18:50 |
|
quote:And that, I think, was the handle — that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn't need that. Our energy would simply PREVAIL. There was no point in fighting — on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave... icantfindaname posted:brexit's not gonna end up happening b/c the british courts are sane, and america's going to elect donald j trump as president I said come in! posted:We are going to make a child rapist and white supremacist the president of the free world. Hieronymous Alloy posted:theoretically he could be impeached. Would require congress to act. Could in theory happen as the result of the Trump University stuff too. Mendrian posted:Like seriously anyone looking at this election and saying it's 'about the issues' or that the president doesn't matter, you're loving delusional, you're a lunatic. The culture wars are real. There are women and PoC who deal with poo poo every day whose enemies are being validated by this election. Sexism and racism are the loving issues you asshats. toanoradian posted:https://twitter.com/bradheath/status/796196451428823040 Roman Reigns posted:Clinton's going to lose, Trump will be president and Republicans will have control of the Senate, House, and likely the Supreme Court. Tortoiseburger posted:You know I was looking forward to watching Freepers melt down all night as Hillary pulled ahead, but honestly the arzying in this thread has been way more entertaining. Crazy Ted posted:A lot of people hate the Clintons. Irrationally. Strangely. Bizarrely. Unexplainably.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2021 15:42 |
|
Recently, I found a drawing from tenth grade, an anime-inspired rendering of someone meant to be the adult me wearing a shredded lace gown and combat boots. quote:The Bride in Her Head
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2021 16:42 |
|
Grapplejack posted:Ff8 loving rules god I love how insane that game is.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2021 19:01 |
|
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2021 16:01 |
|
BitcoinRockefeller posted:I thought bodegas were the push carts that sold things for the longest time because of how new yorkers talk about them like they are so unique, and you don't see those a lot of places. That they think a convenience store that's independently owned is some special thing and not the same as every local gas station in any podunk town is mind blowing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIncGi-Ne2Q
|
# ¿ Oct 6, 2021 16:34 |
|
Vim Fuego posted:You ever use your celebrity platform to spread hatred... on weeeeeed??? The Superintendent of our local school district emailed Chappelle's recentish SNL monologue to every worker in the district, describing it as powerful, important, and mandatory viewing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Un_VvR_WqNs
|
# ¿ Oct 6, 2021 18:21 |
|
is pepsi ok posted:libs be like "why is everyone unhappy with the captain of this sinking ship? he gave such a powerful speech about how we should remain calm and offered everyone a free drink coupon." Ted Kaczynski posted:Ship of Fools https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ted-kaczynski-ship-of-fools Shipon posted:if anything it's even more of a "gently caress you", yeah we know you're suffering but we're not doing anything but empty platitudes deal with it peasant To perhaps make a weird comparison, it reminds me of land acknowledgements. "Yes, we killed your ancestors and took their stuff. You're still poor and disadvantaged because of that, generations later. But we acknowledge that this happened. We're not going to help you or anything, but we'll indirectly brag about how badly your ancestors lost. You are the magical creatures who tend the land, and after things get bad enough that we can't ignore them, we'll probably look to you for solutions that we won't actually do, but we'll pretend to listen."
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2021 15:22 |
|
Has "y''all not ready for that conversation" even been followed up with something substantive? Or it is like "problematic" where it means "I can't articulate my thoughts on this subject in a coherent way, so just acknowledge that I'm right because I said the magic phrase"?
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2021 15:38 |
|
the_steve posted:Sounds like some real purity testing unicorn wanter talk right there. You got to war with the army you have, alright? People who sneer at a half a loaf of bread have never been hungry and if the ends don't justify the means, what does?
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2021 16:33 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:
This the same FBI that refused to acknowledge the existence of the Mafia until the late 50s? https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/1957-meeting-forced-fbi-recognize-mafiaand-changed-justice-system-forever-180967204/
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2021 17:10 |
|
The Pussy Boss posted:where's the lie
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2021 18:59 |
|
Chillgamesh posted:I don't know who needs to hear this but rich people should give me lots of money to do whatever I please with, in order to ease their consciences But what if I'm rich and I want to give the money to my cool black friends who hang out with me and say I'm cool, and not the ones who are mean to me?
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2021 19:17 |
|
mawarannahr posted:that test is racist bullshit that only a democrat would use as a metaphor to try to own someone. welcome to the party! The thing I like about this test is that, as far as I know, the researchers never studied how many of the kids had been lied to and jerked around in the past, and thus had no reason to believe that researcher would actually give them two cookies if they didn't eat the one. Extrapolate this stupidity out, and you have those rationalist weirdos arguing about Pascal's Mugging, where you should just give your wallet to the mugger if he promises to return the next day with a high enough amount, when any rational person would look at the situation and say "Look, it doesn't matter if he promised to come back with $100 or $100,000, we both know he isn't going to meet you back here tomorrow. You're never going to see this guy again. You have better odds of winning the lottery."
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2021 20:10 |
|
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2021 20:23 |
|
Pamela Springstein posted:is there a new cool zone thread? "You never did the Kenosha, kid" "You? Never! Did the Kenosha Kid...?"
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2021 21:31 |
|
PostNouveau posted:AP (and IB) classes are a lot easier to make egalitarian. Just don't put a gate in front of them and let anyone sign up for them. Listen, I could have been somebody, I could have been a contender... But more seriously, the dichotomy between the G&T classes and the regular ones were pretty crazy, and it was weird to see when I was bumped up halfway through the year. Same teacher, same year, different classes. Regular class: "Okay you little shits, I know none of you are paying attention, but Edgar Allen Poe was a guy who existed, and if any of you idiots would bother to read the story, you'd learn that it's about regret and shame..." Honors/G&T class: "So, what did people think about this chapter of the Odyssey? Yes, Margaret, that is a wonderful observation about the use of language in describing Nausicaä and Penelope. Do you think we're meant to draw a comparison between the two? Yes, Caitlyn, that's right, we should compare both of them to Calypso as well. Why do you think Homer draws parallels between Odysseus' wife and the other women he could stay with instead? Excellent, Rebekah, very well spotted! It is intentional!"
|
# ¿ Oct 9, 2021 16:31 |
|
quote:“If you’ve spent time in a Black barbershop or a hair salon, you can understand some of the complexity and potential contradictions around different Black folks’ view,” said Phillips.
|
# ¿ Oct 9, 2021 17:53 |
|
yellowcar posted:also what kind of barber shop has a single chair in the middle of the room and absolutely zero mirrors anywhere I'm sorry, are you racist? Are you really going to claim that it isn't an important part of black culture to sit on an office chair near a bunch of couches to get your hair "did"? Do you not care about what happened to Dana Martin, Jazzaline Ware, Ashanti Carmon, Claire Legato, Muhlaysia Booker, Michelle ‘Tamika’ Washington, Paris Cameron, Chanel Lindsey, Chanel Scurlock, Zoe Spears, Brooklyn Lindsey, Denali, Berries Stuckey, Kiki Fantroy, Pebbles LaDime ‘Dime’ Doe, Tracy Single, Bailey Reeves, Bee Love Slater, and Ja’leyah-Jamar?
|
# ¿ Oct 9, 2021 20:50 |
|
Sartre's conception of Bad Faith is pretty straightforward, and I love it when people gently caress it up because they're uncomfortable with the implications So Sartre starts with a thought experiment: imagine a young man who loves his country, but also sees himself as a devoted son. There is a war on, and the army needs soldiers, but also his mother is very sick and requires care. So the young man needs to choose: will he join the army and fight for his country, or will he stay home and care for his mother? Pretty rough choice to be presented in France just after World War 2 by a guy who was very weird about his experiences in a concentration camp (IIRC Sartre escaped by telling the guard he needed to go pick up some glasses from the optometrist, and then just never came back to the prison). Anyways, our guy can cite all sorts of reasons for making either choice: he's a devoted son, he's a patriot, family is more important than country, if the nation falls his mother will suffer under the occupation, etc. and these are things to take into consideration. But, at the same time, he must make the choice. No one makes it for him, and if he says something like "I must serve in the Army, my country needs me!" or "My mother cannot get along without me, I have no choice but to stay" he is lying. He could choose either one, and he would have to face the consequences for his decision, but it is untrue that he must do one or the other, that there is some external force making him do something. If he claims that he must do XYZ and cannot do otherwise, he is acting in bad faith. He is denying his agency in the situation. He is rejecting his personhood and his responsibility. He is pretending that other people make him do the things he does. And this is where the "hell is other people" from No Exit comes in. In a short, sloppy summary, three people are in Hell. Hell is not some torture chamber or icy lake, it is instead a waiting room with some couches. One of the characters of the play, Garcin, was a journalist who says that he was executed for running a pacifist newspaper. He plays himself up to the other characters as a man of upstanding moral character and iron devotion to truth and all that poo poo. It eventually comes out that he was a coward, and was executed for trying to escape the country. According to him, he was going to Mexico, to start another pacifist newspaper. He swears. Definitely. He's not a coward. Another of the characters, Inez, a lesbian sadist who seduced her cousin's wife, drove her cousin to suicide, and who died in a murder suicide with the cousin's wife killing them both, sees right through his self-justifications and attempts to make himself into the hero of the story who deserves praise from others. She recognizes that he's just a bully who wanted to gently caress around behind his wife's back, and then, when the time came to actually be the Big Man he always presented himself to be, he turned tail and ran. Garcin desperately tries to get the third woman, Estelle (who in hell for murdering her infant child), to love him the way he wants to be loved, but it doesn't take, as she's pretty dumb, and anyways Inez is constantly there mocking him and trying to get Estelle to gently caress her instead. No Exit posted:GARCIN: Still there? Now listen! I want you to do me a service. No, don't shrink away. I know "Hell is other people" when we are trapped with people who force us to be honest, force us to reveal the actual motivations behind our actions, and refuse to indulge in our self-delusions. So, you know, go ahead and vote for the Democrats if you want, but don't pretend it's because they're the Good and Moral party made up of Upstanding and Smart People Who Always Make the Right Decisions Even if They Are Hard and who are Never Bad, and anyways the other party is so wicked that no person could ever have it in their best interests to vote for them. That, plus or minus Virgil Texas, is Bad Faith
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2021 06:51 |
|
Zizek, of course, turns this whole thing into a joke that neatly deflates the binary nature of these types of dilemmas within a larger passage about being "forced" to choosequote:In a well-known passage from his ‘Existentialism and Humanism’, Sartre deployed the dilemma of a young man in France in 1942, torn between the duty to help his lone, ill mother and the duty to enter the war and fight the Germans; Sartre’s point is, of course, that there is no a priori answer to this dilemma. The young man needs to make a decision grounded only in his own abyssal freedom and assume full responsibility for it.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2021 06:57 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 20:19 |
|
gradenko_2000 posted:cured by shifting to eruditocracy. it's a healthy compromise between gatekeeping the vote to those who have bothered to care enough to educate themselves but not gatekeep hard enough to bar people who really want to vote
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2021 16:03 |